• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

自20世纪80年代初以来,是什么推动了保乳手术使用情况的变化?临床试验、名人行动以及美国国立卫生研究院共识声明的作用。

What drove changes in the use of breast conserving surgery since the early 1980s? The role of the clinical trial, celebrity action and an NIH consensus statement.

作者信息

Du X, Freeman D H, Syblik D A

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine and Sealy Center on Aging, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston 77555-0460, USA.

出版信息

Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2000 Jul;62(1):71-9. doi: 10.1023/a:1006414122201.

DOI:10.1023/a:1006414122201
PMID:10989987
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Three important events in the history of breast cancer treatment occurred between 1983 and 1995: a large clinical trial, first lady Nancy Reagan's choice of mastectomy and the publishing of an NIH consensus statement.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the effects of these events on use of breast conserving surgery (BCS).

RESEARCH DESIGN

Data from the cohort study of the surveillance, epidemiology and end results (SEER) Program from 1983 to 1995 were divided into four periods: Baseline, Trial, Celebrity, and Consensus.

SUBJECTS

Of the women, 169,466 diagnosed with early stage breast cancer in nine SEER areas.

MEASURES

Monthly percentages of BCS.

RESULTS

A linear regression model generated a separate intercept and slope term for four time periods, adjusting for demographic characteristics of breast cancer patients. For the Baseline, Celebrity and Consensus Periods, slopes indicated an increasing use of BCS which varied between 0.24% and 0.28% per month. Slopes for these three periods were not statistically different (p = 0.120). In contrast, there was no change in use of BCS during the trial period (p = 0.247). We tested the magnitude of discontinuity between periods. At the beginning of the trial, celebrity and consensus periods, there were increases in BCS of 5.54% (p < 0.001), -3.55% (p < 0.001), and 2.37% (p < 0.001), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of BCS was substantially affected by the reports of a clinical trial of BCS and by celebrity action. These effects were abrupt but transient. The NIH consensus statement stimulated a small change in use of BCS and may be an important intervention for maintaining the increasing trend in use of BCS since the 1990s.

摘要

背景

1983年至1995年间,乳腺癌治疗史上发生了三件大事:一项大型临床试验、第一夫人南希·里根选择乳房切除术以及美国国立卫生研究院(NIH)共识声明的发布。

目的

评估这些事件对保乳手术(BCS)使用情况的影响。

研究设计

1983年至1995年监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)项目队列研究的数据分为四个时期:基线期、试验期、名人效应期和共识期。

研究对象

在九个SEER地区被诊断为早期乳腺癌的169,466名女性。

测量指标

BCS的月度百分比。

结果

线性回归模型为四个时间段分别生成了截距和斜率项,并对乳腺癌患者的人口统计学特征进行了调整。对于基线期、名人效应期和共识期,斜率表明BCS的使用呈上升趋势,每月变化幅度在0.24%至0.28%之间。这三个时期的斜率在统计学上无显著差异(p = 0.120)。相比之下,试验期BCS的使用情况没有变化(p = 0.247)。我们测试了各时期之间的不连续程度。在试验期、名人效应期和共识期开始时,BCS的使用分别增加了5.54%(p < 0.001)、-3.55%(p < 0.001)和2.37%(p < 0.001)。

结论

BCS的使用受到BCS临床试验报告和名人行为的显著影响。这些影响是突然的,但却是短暂的。NIH共识声明促使BCS的使用出现了小幅变化,可能是自20世纪90年代以来维持BCS使用上升趋势的一项重要干预措施。

相似文献

1
What drove changes in the use of breast conserving surgery since the early 1980s? The role of the clinical trial, celebrity action and an NIH consensus statement.自20世纪80年代初以来,是什么推动了保乳手术使用情况的变化?临床试验、名人行动以及美国国立卫生研究院共识声明的作用。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2000 Jul;62(1):71-9. doi: 10.1023/a:1006414122201.
2
Effect of Nancy Reagan's mastectomy on choice of surgery for breast cancer by US women.南希·里根的乳房切除术对美国女性乳腺癌手术选择的影响。
JAMA. 1998 Mar 11;279(10):762-6. doi: 10.1001/jama.279.10.762.
3
Survival after Breast-Conserving Surgery with Whole Breast or Partial Breast Irradiation in Women with Early Stage Breast Cancer: A SEER Data-base Analysis.早期乳腺癌女性保乳手术联合全乳或部分乳腺照射后的生存情况:一项监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)数据库分析
Breast J. 2017 May;23(3):292-298. doi: 10.1111/tbj.12729. Epub 2016 Dec 18.
4
Disparities in the Initial Local Treatment of Older Women with Early-Stage Breast Cancer: A Population-Based Study.老年早期乳腺癌女性初始局部治疗的差异:一项基于人群的研究。
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2017 Jul;26(7):735-744. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2015.5639. Epub 2017 Feb 7.
5
Total Mastectomy or Breast Conservation Therapy? How Radiation Oncologist Accessibility Determines Treatment Choice and Quality: A SEER Data-base Analysis.全乳切除术还是保乳治疗?放射肿瘤学家的可及性如何决定治疗选择和质量:一项监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)数据库分析
Breast J. 2015 Sep-Oct;21(5):473-80. doi: 10.1111/tbj.12449. Epub 2015 Jul 2.
6
The different outcomes between breast-conserving surgery and mastectomy in triple-negative breast cancer: a population-based study from the SEER 18 database.三阴性乳腺癌保乳手术与乳房切除术的不同结局:一项基于SEER 18数据库的人群研究
Oncotarget. 2017 Jan 17;8(3):4773-4780. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.13976.
7
Breast conservation therapy in the United States following the 1990 National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference on the treatment of patients with early stage invasive breast carcinoma.1990年美国国立卫生研究院关于早期浸润性乳腺癌患者治疗的共识发展会议之后美国的保乳治疗。
Cancer. 1999 Aug 15;86(4):628-37.
8
Surgeon characteristics and use of breast conservation surgery in women with early stage breast cancer.早期乳腺癌女性患者的外科医生特征及保乳手术的应用
Ann Surg. 2009 May;249(5):828-33. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181a38f6f.
9
Breast conserving surgery versus mastectomy: overall and relative survival-a population based study by the Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group (DBCG).保乳手术与乳房切除术:总生存率和相对生存率——丹麦乳腺癌合作组(DBCG)的一项基于人群的研究
Acta Oncol. 2018 Jan;57(1):19-25. doi: 10.1080/0284186X.2017.1403042. Epub 2017 Nov 23.
10
Increasing use of elective mastectomy and contralateral prophylactic surgery among breast conservation candidates: a 14-year report from a comprehensive cancer center.保乳手术候选者中选择性乳房切除术和对侧预防性手术的应用日益增多:来自综合性癌症中心的 14 年报告。
Am J Clin Oncol. 2013 Aug;36(4):375-80. doi: 10.1097/COC.0b013e318248da47.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparing Survival Differences between Patients Undergoing Breast-Conserving Therapy Versus Total Mastectomy as a First Treatment for Early Stage Breast Cancer.比较保乳治疗与全乳切除术作为早期乳腺癌初始治疗方法的患者生存差异。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2025 Aug 11. doi: 10.1245/s10434-025-18030-0.
2
Analysis of a Trend Reversal in US Lumpectomy Rates From 2005 Through 2017 Using 3 Nationwide Data Sets.分析 2005 年至 2017 年美国保乳手术率的趋势逆转,使用了 3 个全国性数据集。
JAMA Surg. 2022 Aug 1;157(8):702-711. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2022.2065.
3
Is invasion a necessary step for metastases in breast cancer?
在乳腺癌中,浸润是转移的必要步骤吗?
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2018 May;169(1):9-23. doi: 10.1007/s10549-017-4644-3. Epub 2018 Jan 20.
4
Breast-conserving therapy and modified radical mastectomy for primary breast carcinoma: a matched comparative study.保乳治疗与改良根治术治疗原发性乳腺癌:一项配对比较研究。
Chin J Cancer Res. 2015 Dec;27(6):545-52. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.1000-9604.2015.11.02.
5
Strategies for reducing regional variation in the use of surgery: a systematic review.减少手术使用地区差异的策略:系统评价。
Ann Surg. 2014 Apr;259(4):616-27. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000248.
6
Is the use of preoperative breast MRI predictive of mastectomy?术前乳腺 MRI 的使用是否可预测乳房切除术?
World J Surg Oncol. 2013 Jul 12;11:154. doi: 10.1186/1477-7819-11-154.
7
Trends in mastectomy rates at the Mayo Clinic Rochester: effect of surgical year and preoperative magnetic resonance imaging.罗切斯特梅奥诊所乳房切除术率的趋势:手术年份和术前磁共振成像的影响
J Clin Oncol. 2009 Sep 1;27(25):4082-8. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.19.4225. Epub 2009 Jul 27.
8
Skin cancer coverage in a national newspaper: a teachable moment.一份全国性报纸对皮肤癌的报道:一个可用于教学的时机。
J Cancer Educ. 2007 Summer;22(2):99-104. doi: 10.1007/BF03174356.
9
Racial disparities and trends in radiation therapy after breast-conserving surgery for early-stage breast cancer in women, 1992 to 2002.1992年至2002年女性早期乳腺癌保乳手术后放射治疗的种族差异与趋势
Ethn Dis. 2007 Winter;17(1):122-8.
10
Information on chemotherapy and hormone therapy from tumor registry had moderate agreement with chart reviews.肿瘤登记处提供的化疗和激素治疗信息与病历审查结果具有中度一致性。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2006 Jan;59(1):53-60. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.06.002. Epub 2005 Sep 30.