Nichols L M, Reischauer R D
Urban Institute, Washington, D.C., USA.
Health Aff (Millwood). 2000 Sep-Oct;19(5):30-43. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.19.5.30.
There is much policy talk about making Medicare more competitive, like private markets. But when reform proposals near implementation, local opponents of competition are often able to stop reform experiments. This paper reports on one recent example, the Competitive Pricing Advisory Committee, created by the 1997 Balanced Budget Act (BBA) to bring competitive bidding to Medicare + Choice plans. After design and site-selection choices were announced, members representing local interests were able to delay and perhaps kill competitive bidding before it could start, once again. A public report of this story may save future market-based Medicare reforms from a similar fate.
有很多关于让医疗保险更具竞争力(类似于私人市场)的政策讨论。但当改革提案接近实施时,当地反对竞争的人往往能够阻止改革试验。本文报道了一个近期的例子,即竞争性定价咨询委员会,它由1997年《平衡预算法案》(BBA)设立,旨在将竞争性投标引入“医疗保险+选择”计划。在宣布设计和选址选择后,代表地方利益的成员能够再次在竞争性投标开始之前将其推迟甚至可能扼杀。这个故事的公开报道或许能使未来基于市场的医疗保险改革免遭类似命运。