Dowd B, Coulam R, Feldman R
Division of Health Services Research and Policy, University of Minnesota, USA.
Health Aff (Millwood). 2000 Sep-Oct;19(5):9-29. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.19.5.9.
The current payment system for Medicare + Choice (M + C) plans is based on prices calculated from administrative records. This system has been criticized as arbitrary, inefficient, and unfair. Most Medicare reform proposals would replace the current payment system with some form of competitive pricing. However, efforts over the past five years to demonstrate competitive pricing for M + C plans have been blocked repeatedly by Congress, even when the demonstrations were directly responsive to a congressional mandate. In the absence of political support, a demonstration of competitive pricing may be infeasible, and Congress could be forced to take the risky step of implementing broad Medicare reforms with very little information about their effects.
当前医疗保险+选择(M+C)计划的支付系统是基于从行政记录中计算出的价格。该系统被批评为武断、低效且不公平。大多数医疗保险改革提案会用某种形式的竞争性定价取代当前的支付系统。然而,在过去五年里,为证明M+C计划的竞争性定价所做的努力屡屡被国会阻挠,即便这些示范是直接响应国会的指令。在缺乏政治支持的情况下,竞争性定价示范可能不可行,国会可能被迫采取冒险举措,在对其效果知之甚少的情况下实施广泛的医疗保险改革。