Suppr超能文献

四个城市的故事:医疗保险改革与竞争性定价

A tale of four cities: Medicare reform and competitive pricing.

作者信息

Dowd B, Coulam R, Feldman R

机构信息

Division of Health Services Research and Policy, University of Minnesota, USA.

出版信息

Health Aff (Millwood). 2000 Sep-Oct;19(5):9-29. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.19.5.9.

Abstract

The current payment system for Medicare + Choice (M + C) plans is based on prices calculated from administrative records. This system has been criticized as arbitrary, inefficient, and unfair. Most Medicare reform proposals would replace the current payment system with some form of competitive pricing. However, efforts over the past five years to demonstrate competitive pricing for M + C plans have been blocked repeatedly by Congress, even when the demonstrations were directly responsive to a congressional mandate. In the absence of political support, a demonstration of competitive pricing may be infeasible, and Congress could be forced to take the risky step of implementing broad Medicare reforms with very little information about their effects.

摘要

当前医疗保险+选择(M+C)计划的支付系统是基于从行政记录中计算出的价格。该系统被批评为武断、低效且不公平。大多数医疗保险改革提案会用某种形式的竞争性定价取代当前的支付系统。然而,在过去五年里,为证明M+C计划的竞争性定价所做的努力屡屡被国会阻挠,即便这些示范是直接响应国会的指令。在缺乏政治支持的情况下,竞争性定价示范可能不可行,国会可能被迫采取冒险举措,在对其效果知之甚少的情况下实施广泛的医疗保险改革。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验