Szucs T D, Berger K, März W, Schäfer J R
Abteilung Medizinische Okonomie, Universitätsspital Zürich.
Herz. 2000 Aug;25(5):487-94. doi: 10.1007/pl00001961.
Secondary coronary prevention with lipid lowering drugs has become a major issue in health policy formulation due to the large upfront investment in drug therapy. The recently completed LIPID trial with pravastatin in secondary prevention immediately raise the question whether pravastatin might be cost-effective in Germany. We conducted a cost-effectiveness analysis from the perspective of third party payers. The following costs were included in the analysis: daily treatment costs of pravastatin, non-fatal myocardial infarction, coronary bypass operations and stroke. Life years gained were obtained by applying the declining exponential approximation of life expectancy. All calculations were standardized to 1,000 treated patients. The net costs of treating 1,000 patients (i.e. drug costs minus the costs of sequelae and interventions) are DM 8.4 Mio. In addition, a total of 405 life years may be saved through treatment. The corresponding cost-effectiveness of pravastatin treatment is DM 20,674,-(DM 17,314,-, discounted by 3% p.a.).
由于药物治疗前期投入巨大,使用降脂药物进行二级冠状动脉预防已成为卫生政策制定中的一个主要问题。最近完成的使用普伐他汀进行二级预防的LIPID试验立即引发了一个问题,即普伐他汀在德国是否具有成本效益。我们从第三方支付者的角度进行了成本效益分析。分析中包括以下成本:普伐他汀的每日治疗成本、非致命性心肌梗死、冠状动脉搭桥手术和中风。通过应用预期寿命的递减指数近似值来获得生命年数的增加。所有计算都按1000名接受治疗的患者进行了标准化。治疗1000名患者的净成本(即药物成本减去后遗症和干预措施的成本)为840万德国马克。此外,通过治疗总共可挽救405个生命年。普伐他汀治疗相应的成本效益为20674德国马克(17314德国马克,按每年3%贴现)。