zur Stadt U, Harms D O, Schlüter S, Jorch N, Spaar H J, Nürnberger W, Völpel S, Gutjahr P, Schrappe M, Janka G, Kabisch H
Abt. für pädiatrische Hämatologie und Onkologie, Universitätskinderklinik Eppendorf, Hamburg.
Klin Padiatr. 2000 Jul-Aug;212(4):169-73. doi: 10.1055/s-2000-9672.
The detection of minimal residual disease (MRD) is a major prognostic factor for treatment in acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) of childhood. Several groups showed the predictive value of MRD after 5 weeks of chemotherapy (at the end of induction therapy). Patients with more than 1 leukemic cells in 100 cells (> or = 10(-2)) at this time-point have a significantly higher relapse rate. The MRD measurement has been shown to be an independent prognostic factor at several time points in the BFM study (ALL-BFM 90) as well as in the EORTC study. The aim of our investigations was the detection of MRD at the end of induction therapy within the COALL studies which is different from the above studies. In the COALL studies, therapy starts with a 1 week DNR prephase (24 h infusion on day one) and i.th. MTX. Induction therapy consisted of 3 drugs over a period of 4 weeks (Prednisolone, Vincristine and Daunorubicin), asparaginase is given later in consolidation. At the end of induction therapy, bone marrow was obtained for cytomorphologic and molecular analysis.
We investigated bone marrow samples from 76 patients. All patients were in morphologic remission at the end. of induction therapy. For MRD analysis, DNA was isolated from bone marrow mononuclear cells. Clonal T-cell-receptor (TCR) or immunoglobulin gene (IgH) rearrangements were identified by PCR. Monoclonal products were either sequenced directly (TCR) or after excision from high resolution agarose gels. Subsequently patient-specific oligonucleotides for allele-specific PCR were generated. PCR analysis was performed with 1 microgram DNA for each reaction within a semiquantitative matter. This method reached sensitivities down to 10(-5).
Eighty-four percent of the analysed samples were MRD positive at the end of induction therapy. 20 out of 76 patient samples (26%) were highly positive (> or = 10(-2)), 28 patients had levels of about 10(-3) (37%), 16 had levels around 10(-4) (21%) and 12 patients had no detectable residual cells (16%). All analysed 15 T-ALL patients had detectable residual disease at this timepoint. Until now, 5/20 patients with very high MRD level at the end of induction therapy suffered a relapse.
Patients with very high MRD level at the end of induction therapy showed an elevated risk of relapse, but the predictive value is much poorer than for example in the BFM 90 MRD-study. We suggest, that a high MRD level at this timepoint results from a different induction therapy compared to the BFM 90 study. In the COALL studies asparaginase is given only after induction therapy to decrease the risk of thrombosis. We would like to conclude that this differences were compensated later during therapy as the event free survival of both studies is similar. In conclusion, an optimal information from MRD studies is strongly associated with the given therapy. Therefore we initiated an additional MRD time-point after the first chemotherapy block in consolidation.
微小残留病(MRD)的检测是儿童急性淋巴细胞白血病(ALL)治疗的主要预后因素。多个研究组显示了化疗5周后(诱导治疗结束时)MRD的预测价值。此时每100个细胞中白血病细胞超过1个(≥10⁻²)的患者复发率显著更高。在BFM研究(ALL - BFM 90)以及EORTC研究的多个时间点,MRD检测已被证明是一个独立的预后因素。我们研究的目的是在COALL研究中诱导治疗结束时检测MRD,这与上述研究不同。在COALL研究中,治疗始于1周的柔红霉素前期(第1天24小时输注)和鞘内甲氨蝶呤。诱导治疗由4周内的3种药物(泼尼松龙、长春新碱和柔红霉素)组成,天冬酰胺酶在巩固期后期给予。诱导治疗结束时,获取骨髓进行细胞形态学和分子分析。
我们研究了76例患者的骨髓样本。所有患者在诱导治疗结束时均处于形态学缓解状态。对于MRD分析,从骨髓单个核细胞中分离DNA。通过PCR鉴定克隆性T细胞受体(TCR)或免疫球蛋白基因(IgH)重排。单克隆产物要么直接测序(TCR),要么从高分辨率琼脂糖凝胶中切下后测序。随后生成用于等位基因特异性PCR的患者特异性寡核苷酸。在半定量方式下,每个反应使用1微克DNA进行PCR分析。该方法的灵敏度可达10⁻⁵。
84%的分析样本在诱导治疗结束时MRD呈阳性。76例患者样本中有20例(26%)高度阳性(≥10⁻²),28例患者水平约为10⁻³(37%),16例水平约为10⁻⁴(21%),12例患者未检测到残留细胞(16%)。所有分析的15例T - ALL患者在该时间点均检测到残留病。到目前为止,诱导治疗结束时MRD水平非常高的20例患者中有5例复发。
诱导治疗结束时MRD水平非常高的患者复发风险升高,但预测价值比例如BFM 90 MRD研究差得多。我们认为,此时高MRD水平是由于与BFM 90研究相比诱导治疗不同所致。在COALL研究中,天冬酰胺酶仅在诱导治疗后给予以降低血栓形成风险。我们想得出结论,这些差异在治疗后期得到了弥补,因为两项研究的无事件生存率相似。总之,MRD研究的最佳信息与所给予的治疗密切相关。因此,我们在巩固期的第一个化疗阶段后启动了一个额外的MRD时间点。