Suppr超能文献

[用于评估骨质疏松症患者生活质量的ECOS-16临床问卷的研制]

[Development of the ECOS-16 clinical questionnaire for the assessment of the quality of life in patients with osteoporosis].

作者信息

Badia X, Prieto L, Roset M, Díez-Pérez A

机构信息

Instituto de Salud Pública de Cataluña, Universidad de Barcelona.

出版信息

Med Clin (Barc). 2000;114 Suppl 3:68-75.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The use of currently validated instruments to measure the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of patients with osteoporosis in daily clinical practice is not feasible due to the length of time needed to be administered. The objective of the present study was to develop a new, short questionnaire for women with vertebral fractures due to osteoporosis.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The administration of two disease-specific questionnaires (OQLQ and QUALEFFO) and the generic SF-36 questionnaire to 338 women with vertebral fracture due to osteoporosis allowed the development of a new questionnaire in 5 stages: i) search for a common structure in both questionnaires; ii) independent reduction of items in the OQLQ and QUALEFFO using Rasch analysis; iii) aggregation of remaining items in both questionnaires into distinct dimensions; iv) quantitative reduction of redundant items in aggregated dimensions; v) qualitative item reduction in aggregated scales.

RESULTS

The methodology of the study allowed the development of a 16 item questionnaire (ECOS-16), with 4 items taken from the OQLQ and 12 from the QUALEFFO. The items are grouped into 4 categories: physical functioning (5 items), illness-related fears (2 items), psychosocial functioning (4 items), and pain (5 items).

CONCLUSIONS

The ECOS-16 will be a promising alternative, once it is validated, to generic questionnaires and to the specific questionnaires from which its content was extracted, particularly for patients with osteoporotic vertebral fracture in daily clinical practice.

摘要

背景

由于目前用于测量骨质疏松症患者健康相关生活质量(HRQoL)的有效工具在日常临床实践中使用时所需时间较长,因此并不可行。本研究的目的是为因骨质疏松症导致椎体骨折的女性开发一种新的简短问卷。

患者与方法

对338名因骨质疏松症导致椎体骨折的女性进行两种疾病特异性问卷(OQLQ和QUALEFFO)以及通用的SF - 36问卷的调查,分5个阶段开发新问卷:i)在两份问卷中寻找共同结构;ii)使用拉施分析独立减少OQLQ和QUALEFFO中的条目;iii)将两份问卷中剩余的条目汇总为不同维度;iv)定量减少汇总维度中冗余的条目;v)定性减少汇总量表中的条目。

结果

该研究方法开发出了一份包含16个条目的问卷(ECOS - 16),其中4个条目取自OQLQ,12个条目取自QUALEFFO。这些条目分为4类:身体功能(5个条目)、疾病相关恐惧(2个条目)、心理社会功能(4个条目)和疼痛(5个条目)。

结论

一旦ECOS - 16经过验证,它将有望成为通用问卷以及从中提取内容的特定问卷的替代方案,特别是在日常临床实践中对于患有骨质疏松性椎体骨折的患者。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验