• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利多卡因脊髓麻醉的潜在神经毒性。

Potential neurotoxicity of spinal anesthesia with lidocaine.

作者信息

Johnson M E

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn 55905, USA.

出版信息

Mayo Clin Proc. 2000 Sep;75(9):921-32. doi: 10.4065/75.9.921.

DOI:10.4065/75.9.921
PMID:10994828
Abstract

Spinal (intrathecal) anesthesia has evolved into a safe, widely accepted method of anesthesia with many advantages. However, the past decade has seen a large number of case reports and incidence studies that implicate the local anesthetic (LA) lidocaine as being more neurotoxic than other commonly used LAs such as bupivacaine and tetracaine, based on patterns of clinical use current at the time of those reports. Available studies suggest a risk of persistent lumbosacral neuropathy after spinal lidocaine by single injection in about 1 in 1300 procedures and a risk as high as about 1 in 200 after continuous spinal anesthesia with lidocaine. While uncommon, this risk is probably an order of magnitude higher than the risk reported for other commonly used LAs or for general anesthesia. Spinal lidocaine is also implicated in the syndrome of transient neurologic symptoms (previously referred to as transient radicular irritation), manifest by pain or dysesthesia in the buttocks or legs after recovery from anesthesia. Although the pain typically resolves within 1 week without lasting sequelae, it can be severe in up to one third of patients with the syndrome. In addition to clinical studies, both whole animal and in vitro studies have shown that lidocaine can be neurotoxic at clinically available concentrations and that lidocaine is more neurotoxic than equipotent concentrations of other commonly used LAs. The mechanism of this neurotoxicity may involve changes in cytoplasmic calcium homeostasis and mitochondrial membrane potential.

摘要

脊髓(鞘内)麻醉已发展成为一种安全且被广泛接受的麻醉方法,具有诸多优点。然而,在过去十年中,大量的病例报告和发病率研究表明,基于这些报告发布时的临床使用模式,局部麻醉药(LA)利多卡因比其他常用的局部麻醉药(如布比卡因和丁卡因)具有更高的神经毒性。现有研究表明,单次注射脊髓利多卡因后,约每1300例手术中有1例存在持续性腰骶神经病变的风险,而连续脊髓麻醉使用利多卡因后,风险高达约每200例中有1例。虽然这种风险并不常见,但可能比其他常用局部麻醉药或全身麻醉所报告的风险高一个数量级。脊髓利多卡因还与短暂性神经症状综合征(以前称为短暂性神经根刺激)有关,表现为麻醉恢复后臀部或腿部疼痛或感觉异常。虽然疼痛通常在1周内缓解且无持久后遗症,但在该综合征患者中,高达三分之一的患者疼痛可能较为严重。除了临床研究外,整体动物和体外研究均表明,利多卡因在临床可用浓度下可能具有神经毒性,且利多卡因比其他常用局部麻醉药的等效浓度具有更高的神经毒性。这种神经毒性的机制可能涉及细胞质钙稳态和线粒体膜电位的变化。

相似文献

1
Potential neurotoxicity of spinal anesthesia with lidocaine.利多卡因脊髓麻醉的潜在神经毒性。
Mayo Clin Proc. 2000 Sep;75(9):921-32. doi: 10.4065/75.9.921.
2
Transient radiculopathy after 5% lidocaine or 0.75% bupivacaine spinal anesthesia in 3 surgical positions.3种手术体位下5%利多卡因或0.75%布比卡因脊髓麻醉后出现的短暂性神经根病
AANA J. 2001 Oct;69(5):399-404.
3
Hyperosmolarity does not contribute to transient radicular irritation after spinal anesthesia with hyperbaric 5% lidocaine.使用5% 高压利多卡因进行脊髓麻醉后,高渗性不会导致短暂性神经根刺激。
Reg Anesth. 1995 Sep-Oct;20(5):363-8.
4
A similar incidence of transient neurologic symptoms after spinal anesthesia with 2% and 5% lidocaine.使用2%和5%利多卡因进行脊髓麻醉后,短暂性神经症状的发生率相似。
Anesth Analg. 1996 Nov;83(5):1051-4. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199611000-00026.
5
AANA Journal course: transient neurologic symptoms and spinal anesthesia.
AANA J. 2000 Apr;68(2):163-8.
6
The recovery profile of hyperbaric spinal anesthesia with lidocaine, tetracaine, and bupivacaine.利多卡因、丁卡因和布比卡因用于高压脊麻的恢复情况
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 1998 Mar-Apr;23(2):159-63. doi: 10.1097/00115550-199823020-00008.
7
Transient radicular irritation after spinal anesthesia induced with hyperbaric solutions of cerebrospinal fluid-diluted lidocaine 50 mg/ml or mepivacaine 40 mg/ml or bupivacaine 5 mg/ml.使用脑脊液稀释的50毫克/毫升利多卡因、40毫克/毫升甲哌卡因或5毫克/毫升布比卡因的高压溶液诱导脊髓麻醉后出现短暂性神经根刺激。
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1998 Aug;42(7):765-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.1998.tb05319.x.
8
Intrathecally, Caine may dis-Able. Reflections on lidocaine for spinal anesthesia.鞘内注射时,卡因可能会失效。关于利多卡因用于脊髓麻醉的思考。
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand Suppl. 1998;113:3-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.1998.tb04978.x.
9
[Neurotoxicity of intrathecal lidocaine].
Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim. 2001 Aug-Sep;48(7):326-36.
10
Conus medullaris injury following both tetracaine and lidocaine spinal anesthesia.丁卡因和利多卡因脊髓麻醉后圆锥损伤。
J Clin Anesth. 1996 Dec;8(8):656-8. doi: 10.1016/s0952-8180(96)00146-8.

引用本文的文献

1
P53 and taurine upregulated gene 1 promotes the repair of the DeoxyriboNucleic Acid damage induced by bupivacaine in murine primary sensory neurons.P53 和牛磺酸上调基因 1 促进布比卡因诱导的小鼠原代感觉神经元脱氧核糖核酸损伤的修复。
Bioengineered. 2022 Mar;13(3):7439-7456. doi: 10.1080/21655979.2022.2048985.
2
Risk of Dementia in Patients Who Underwent Surgery under Neuraxial Anesthesia: A Nationwide Cohort Study.接受椎管内麻醉手术患者的痴呆风险:一项全国性队列研究
J Pers Med. 2021 Dec 20;11(12):1386. doi: 10.3390/jpm11121386.
3
An inadvertent subarachnoid injection reversed by cerebrospinal fluid lavage for the treatment of chronic low back pain: A case report.
经脑脊液灌洗逆转意外蛛网膜下腔注射用于治疗慢性下腰痛:一例报告
Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Feb;98(6):e14406. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000014406.
4
Continuous Spinal Anesthesia for Obstetric Anesthesia and Analgesia.连续蛛网膜下腔麻醉用于产科麻醉和镇痛。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2017 Aug 15;4:133. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2017.00133. eCollection 2017.
5
Neurotoxicity Comparison of Two Types of Local Anaesthetics: Amide-Bupivacaine versus Ester-Procaine.两种局部麻醉剂的神经毒性比较:酰胺类布比卡因与酯类普鲁卡因。
Sci Rep. 2017 Mar 24;7:45316. doi: 10.1038/srep45316.
6
Comparison of saddle, lumbar epidural and caudal blocks on anal sphincter tone: A prospective, randomized study.鞍区阻滞、腰段硬膜外阻滞和骶管阻滞对肛门括约肌张力影响的比较:一项前瞻性随机研究。
J Int Med Res. 2016 Oct;44(5):1061-1071. doi: 10.1177/0300060516659393. Epub 2016 Sep 29.
7
Synergistic effect of lidocaine with pingyangmycin for treatment of venous malformation using a mouse spleen model.利多卡因与平阳霉素对小鼠脾脏模型静脉畸形治疗的协同作用
Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2014 Apr 15;7(5):2324-36. eCollection 2014.