Howden-Chapman P, Ashton T
Department of Public Health, Wellington School of Medicine, University of Otago, P.O. Box 7343, South, Wellington, New Zealand.
Health Policy. 2000 Nov 1;54(1):27-43. doi: 10.1016/s0168-8510(00)00095-6.
The 1993 Health and Disability Services Act heralded a range of structural reforms in the New Zealand health care system. Despite these reforms considerable resources being spent on convincing consumers of their merits, have failed to gain widespread public approval. This paper examines two key issues that have arisen during the reform process. These are the difficulties associated with trying to set priorities in ways which are effective and politically acceptable, and the relationship between the public and private sectors. Unacknowledged conflicts of interest have helped to undermine the priority setting process. The discussion suggests that it may be increasingly difficult for any government in future to determine the allocation of resources without taking private sector interests and rising public concern into account. It remains to be seen which of these factors is more powerful.
1993年的《健康与残疾服务法案》预示着新西兰医疗体系的一系列结构改革。尽管进行了这些改革,花费了大量资源来说服消费者这些改革的优点,但仍未获得广泛的公众认可。本文探讨了改革过程中出现的两个关键问题。这两个问题分别是,试图以有效且在政治上可接受的方式确定优先事项所面临的困难,以及公共部门与私营部门之间的关系。未被承认的利益冲突削弱了优先事项的设定过程。讨论表明,未来任何政府若不考虑私营部门利益和公众日益增长的关切,可能越来越难以确定资源分配。这些因素中哪一个更具影响力,还有待观察。