Int J Health Serv. 2014;44(3):507-24. doi: 10.2190/HS.44.3.e.
Market-oriented health care reforms have been implemented in the tax-financed Swedish health care system from 1990 to 2013. The first phase of these reforms was the introduction of new public management systems, where public health centers and public hospitals were to act as private firms in an internal health care market. A second phase saw an increase of tax-financed private for-profit providers. A third phase can now be envisaged with increased private financing of essential health services. The main evidence-based effects of these markets and profit-driven reforms can be summarized as follows: efficiency is typically reduced but rarely increased; profit and tax evasion are a drain on resources for health care; geographical and social inequities are widened while the number of tax-financed providers increases; patients with major multi-health problems are often given lower priority than patients with minor health problems; opportunities to control the quality of care are reduced; tax-financed private for-profit providers facilitate increased private financing; and market forces and commercial interests undermine the power of democratic institutions. Policy options to promote further development of a nonprofit health care system are highlighted.
自 1990 年至 2013 年,市场化医疗改革在瑞典税收资助型医疗体系中逐步推行。这些改革的第一阶段是引入新的公共管理系统,公共医疗中心和公立医院要在内部医疗市场中像私营企业一样运作。第二阶段增加了税收资助的盈利性私营提供者。如今,我们可以预见第三阶段,即更多地利用私人资金来为基本医疗服务提供资金。这些市场和利润驱动型改革的主要循证影响可以概括如下:效率通常降低而很少提高;利润和逃税会消耗医疗保健资源;地理和社会不平等加剧,而税收资助的提供者数量增加;患有多种重大健康问题的患者往往不如患有较小健康问题的患者优先得到治疗;控制医疗质量的机会减少;税收资助的盈利性私营提供者为增加私人资金提供了便利;市场力量和商业利益破坏了民主机构的权力。突出强调了促进非营利性医疗体系进一步发展的政策选择。