Suppr超能文献

双间隔迫选范式中的信号检测理论:注意力、通道不确定性与概率求和

Signal detection theory in the 2AFC paradigm: attention, channel uncertainty and probability summation.

作者信息

Tyler C W, Chen C C

机构信息

Smith-Kettlewell Eye Research Institute, 2318 Fillmore St., 94115, San Francisco, CA, USA.

出版信息

Vision Res. 2000;40(22):3121-44. doi: 10.1016/s0042-6989(00)00157-7.

Abstract

Neural implementation of classical High-Threshold Theory reveals fundamental flaws in its applicability to realistic neural systems and to the two-alternative forced-choice (2AFC) paradigm. For 2AFC, Signal Detection Theory provides a basis for accurate analysis of the observer's attentional strategy and effective degree of probability summation over attended neural channels. The resulting theory provides substantially different predictions from those of previous approximation analyses. In additive noise, attentional probability summation depends on the attentional model assumed. (1) For an ideal attentional strategy in additive noise, summation proceeds at a diminishing rate from an initial level of fourth-root summation for the first few channels. The maximum improvement asymptotes to about a factor of 4 by a million channels. (2) For a fixed attention field in additive noise, detection is highly inefficient at first and approximates fourth-root summation through the summation range. (3) In physiologically plausible root-multiplicative noise, on the other hand, attentional probability summation mimics a linear improvement in sensitivity up to about ten channels, approaching a factor of 1000 by a million channels. (4) Some noise sources, such as noise from eye movements, are fully multiplicative and would prevent threshold determination within their range of effectiveness. Such results may require reappraisal of previous interpretations of detection behavior in the 2AFC paradigm.

摘要

经典高阈值理论的神经实现揭示了其在应用于现实神经系统和二选一强制选择(2AFC)范式时存在的根本缺陷。对于2AFC,信号检测理论为准确分析观察者的注意力策略以及在被关注神经通道上概率求和的有效程度提供了基础。由此产生的理论与先前的近似分析得出的预测结果有很大不同。在加性噪声中,注意力概率求和取决于所假设的注意力模型。(1)对于加性噪声中的理想注意力策略,求和从最初几个通道的四次方根求和水平开始,以递减速率进行。到一百万个通道时,最大改进渐近于约4倍。(2)对于加性噪声中的固定注意力场,最初检测效率极低,在求和范围内近似于四次方根求和。(3)另一方面,在生理上合理的根乘性噪声中,注意力概率求和在大约十个通道之前模拟灵敏度的线性提高,到一百万个通道时接近1000倍。(4)一些噪声源,如眼动产生的噪声,是完全乘性的,会在其有效范围内阻止阈值确定。这些结果可能需要重新评估先前对2AFC范式中检测行为的解释。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验