Finazzi G, Ruggeri M, Rodeghiero F, Barbui T
Divisions of Haematology, Ospedali Riuniti, Bergamo, and Ospedale S. Bortolo, Vicenza, Italy.
Br J Haematol. 2000 Sep;110(3):577-83. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2141.2000.02188.x.
We have previously demonstrated that hydroxyurea (HU) reduces the rate of vascular complications in patients with essential thrombocythaemia (ET) at high risk of thrombosis. However, the relatively short follow-up (median 27 months) did not enable the evaluation of the risk of developing secondary malignancies. In this study, we report the long-term outcome of the 114 patients included in the trial: 56 patients randomized to receive HU and 58 patients to receive no cytoreductive therapy. Before randomization, 15 patients had been treated with busulphan. During the observation period, 29 patients (50%) shifted from the control to the HU group mainly because of thrombosis. Median follow-up was 73 months (range 3-94). Analysis was by intention to treat and, when indicated, by treatment. When analysed by intention to treat, 46 out of 54 patients (85%) originally randomized in the HU group are alive, compared with 49 of 58 patients (84%) in the control group [not significant (n.s.)]. Five patients (9%) in the HU group and 26 patients (45%) in the control group had thrombosis (P < 0.0001). Seven patients (13%) in the HU group developed secondary acute leukaemia, myelodysplastic syndromes or solid tumours, compared with only one of the control group patients (1.7%) (P = 0.032). The occurrence of secondary malignancies was also analysed by treatment: none of the 20 patients who had never been treated with chemotherapy developed neoplasia vs. three of the 77 patients given HU only (3.9% n.s.) and five of the 15 patients given busulphan plus HU (33% P < 0. 0001). This study showed that: (a) HU reduced the risk of thrombosis in ET patients; (b) the sequential use of busulphan and HU significantly increased the risk of second malignancies; and (c) overall survival was not affected by HU therapy.
我们之前已经证明,羟基脲(HU)可降低有高血栓形成风险的原发性血小板增多症(ET)患者的血管并发症发生率。然而,相对较短的随访时间(中位时间27个月)无法对发生继发性恶性肿瘤的风险进行评估。在本研究中,我们报告了该试验纳入的114例患者的长期结果:56例患者随机接受HU治疗,58例患者不接受细胞减灭治疗。随机分组前,15例患者曾接受白消安治疗。在观察期内,29例患者(50%)从对照组转至HU组,主要原因是发生了血栓形成。中位随访时间为73个月(范围3 - 94个月)。分析采用意向性治疗分析,必要时按治疗情况分析。在意向性治疗分析中,最初随机分组至HU组的54例患者中有46例(85%)存活,而对照组58例患者中有49例(84%)存活[无显著性差异(n.s.)]。HU组有5例患者(9%)发生血栓形成,对照组有26例患者(45%)发生血栓形成(P < 0.0001)。HU组有7例患者(13%)发生继发性急性白血病、骨髓增生异常综合征或实体瘤,而对照组仅1例患者(1.7%)发生(P = 0.;032)。还按治疗情况分析了继发性恶性肿瘤的发生情况:从未接受过化疗的20例患者中无1例发生肿瘤,仅接受HU治疗的77例患者中有3例(3.9%,无显著性差异)发生,接受白消安加HU治疗的15例患者中有5例(33%,P < 0.0001)发生。本研究表明:(a)HU降低了ET患者的血栓形成风险;(b)序贯使用白消安和HU显著增加了继发性恶性肿瘤的风险;(c)HU治疗对总生存率无影响。