Graybiel A, Wood C D, Knepton J, Hoche J P, Perkins G F
Aviat Space Environ Med. 1975 Sep;46(9):1107-18.
The present study was undertaken to improve previous testing procedures, involving the use of a slow rotation room, for assessing the efficacy of antimotion sickness drugs which had validity for groups of subjects but not for each individual in the group. Three major changes were introduced: first, the use of an incremental increase in the intensity of the stressful stimuli of constant intensity; second, a systematic distribution of placebos, rather than a random distribution, in using a modified Latin-square design; third, categorizing the responses as "inconsquential," "beneficial," and "detrimental"--the range of the "placebo responses" was doubled to define the inconsequential range and response above or below were, respectively, beneficial or detrimental. Only drugs known to have antimotion sickness effectiveness were tested and the cardinal findings can be briefly summarized: 1) The group responses were similar to the data previously reported; 2) Great individual differences in response to antimotion sickness drugs were revealed, implying that individual assessments must be made for maximal benefits; 3) The fixed-dose combination of promethazine hydrochloride and ephedrine sulfate (25 mg each) proved to be outstanding as this combination of homergic drugs clearly exhibited a suprasummation effect; and 4) A few tests were conducted using larger than usual doses and the results supported previous findings that, for a maximal beneficial effect in response to a single dose, individuals may vary both with regard to the choice of drug and the amount administered.
本研究旨在改进先前的测试程序,该程序涉及使用慢速旋转室来评估抗晕动病药物的疗效,此前的测试程序对受试者群体有效,但对群体中的个体无效。引入了三项主要变化:第一,在恒定强度的应激刺激强度上采用递增方式;第二,在使用改良拉丁方设计时,采用安慰剂的系统分布而非随机分布;第三,将反应分为“无关紧要”、“有益”和“有害”——“安慰剂反应”范围扩大一倍以定义无关紧要的范围,高于或低于该范围的反应分别为有益或有害。仅对已知具有抗晕动病效果的药物进行了测试,主要发现可简要总结如下:1)群体反应与先前报告的数据相似;2)揭示了个体对抗晕动病药物反应的巨大差异,这意味着必须进行个体评估以获得最大益处;3)盐酸异丙嗪和硫酸麻黄碱的固定剂量组合(各25毫克)被证明效果显著,因为这种同类药物组合明显表现出超相加效应;4)使用了比通常剂量更大的剂量进行了一些测试,结果支持了先前的发现,即对于单剂量的最大有益效果,个体在药物选择和给药量方面可能存在差异。