Suppr超能文献

初级保健中的抑郁症工具包。

The depression in primary care tool kit.

作者信息

Brody D S, Dietrich A J, deGruy F, Kroenke K

机构信息

MCP Hahnemann University School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19102-1192, USA.

出版信息

Int J Psychiatry Med. 2000;30(2):99-110. doi: 10.2190/RE91-3B1P-J6CP-W7L0.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

A tool kit was developed to help primary care physicians overcome some of the barriers to recognition and management of depression.

METHOD

Tools were collected from a variety of sources, categorized by function, and evaluated on the basis of previously established criteria, with the best tools selected for inclusion in the tool kit. New tools were developed when an adequate tool for a desired function was not available. The tool kit was reviewed and then revised based on the feedback from eleven experts on depression in primary care, five medical directors from health care systems or managed care companies, and eighteen primary care physicians. All eighteen primary care physicians completed a questionnaire after reviewing the tool kit as part of the evaluation process.

RESULTS

Only five of the eighteen physicians were using any kind of tool for depression prior to reviewing the tool kit. All eighteen physicians indicated that they were likely to use one or more of the components of the tool kit. On average, physicians indicated they were likely to use 6.5 of the ten types of tools included in the kit.

CONCLUSIONS

A depression tool kit containing screening, diagnostic, management planning, and outcomes assessment questionnaires as well as treatment and counseling guidelines, information tables, flow charts, and patient education materials is likely to be well received by primary care physicians. However, its effectiveness may have as much to do with how its use is organized and implemented as it does with the intrinsic value of its components.

摘要

目的

开发一套工具包,以帮助初级保健医生克服在识别和管理抑郁症方面的一些障碍。

方法

从各种来源收集工具,按功能分类,并根据先前确立的标准进行评估,选择最佳工具纳入工具包。当缺乏实现所需功能的合适工具时,开发新工具。根据来自11名初级保健抑郁症专家、5名医疗保健系统或管理式医疗公司的医学主任以及18名初级保健医生的反馈,对工具包进行审查,然后修订。作为评估过程的一部分,所有18名初级保健医生在审查工具包后完成了一份问卷。

结果

在审查工具包之前,18名医生中只有5人使用过任何抑郁症相关工具。所有18名医生均表示他们可能会使用工具包中的一种或多种组件。平均而言,医生们表示他们可能会使用工具包中十种工具类型中的6.5种。

结论

一个包含筛查、诊断、管理计划和结果评估问卷以及治疗和咨询指南、信息表、流程图和患者教育材料的抑郁症工具包可能会受到初级保健医生的欢迎。然而,其有效性可能与其使用的组织和实施方式以及其组件的内在价值同样相关。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验