Owens I P, Bennett P M
Department of Zoology and Entomology, University of Queensland, Brisbane 4072, Australia.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000 Oct 24;97(22):12144-8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.200223397.
Understanding the ecological mechanisms that underlie extinction is fundamental to conservation. It is well established that not all taxa are equally vulnerable to extinction, but the reasons for these differences are poorly understood. This may be, in part, because different taxa are threatened by different mechanisms. Theoretically, sources of extinction risk that perturb the balance between fecundity and longevity, such as human persecution and introduced predators, should be particularly hazardous for taxa that have slow rates of population growth. In contrast, sources of extinction risk that reduce niche availability, such as habitat loss, should represent a particular threat to taxa that are ecologically specialized. Here we test these predictions by using a phylogenetic comparative method and a database on 95 families of birds. As theory predicts, extinction risk incurred through persecution and introduced predators is associated with large body size and long generation time but is not associated with degree of specialization, whereas extinction risk incurred through habitat loss is associated with habitat specialization and small body size but not with generation time. These results demonstrate the importance of considering separately the multiple mechanisms that underlie contemporary patterns of extinction. They also reveal why it has previously proven so difficult to identify simple ecological correlates of overall extinction risk.
了解导致物种灭绝的生态机制是保护工作的基础。众所周知,并非所有分类单元都同样容易灭绝,但对于这些差异的原因却知之甚少。部分原因可能是不同的分类单元受到不同机制的威胁。从理论上讲,那些扰乱繁殖力和寿命之间平衡的灭绝风险源,如人类迫害和引入的捕食者,对于种群增长速度缓慢的分类单元应该特别危险。相比之下,那些减少生态位可用性的灭绝风险源,如栖息地丧失,应该对生态上特化的分类单元构成特别威胁。在这里,我们使用系统发育比较方法和一个关于95个鸟类科的数据库来检验这些预测。正如理论所预测的那样,因迫害和引入捕食者而产生的灭绝风险与体型大、世代时间长有关,但与特化程度无关,而因栖息地丧失而产生的灭绝风险与栖息地特化和体型小有关,但与世代时间无关。这些结果证明了分别考虑构成当代灭绝模式的多种机制的重要性。它们还揭示了为什么以前很难确定总体灭绝风险的简单生态关联因素。