• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Physician views on practicing professionalism in the corporate age.

作者信息

Castellani B, Wear D

机构信息

Department of Behavioral Sciences, Northeastern Ohio University College of Medicine, USA.

出版信息

Qual Health Res. 2000 Jul;10(4):490-506. doi: 10.1177/104973200129118598.

DOI:10.1177/104973200129118598
PMID:11010074
Abstract

Arnold Relman argues that medical education does not prepare students and residents to practice their profession in today's corporate health care system. Corporate health care administrators agree: Physicians enter the workforce unskilled in contract negotiation, evidence-based medicine, navigating bureaucratic systems, and so forth. What about practicing physicians? Do they agree as well? According to this study, they do. Feeling like decentered double agents and unprepared, physicians find themselves professionally lost, struggling to balance issues of cost and care and expressing lots of negativity toward the cultures of medicine and managed care. However, physicians are resilient. A group of physicians, who may be called proactive, are meeting the professional demands of corporate health care by becoming sophisticated about its bureaucratic organization and the ways in which their professional and personal commitments fit within the system. Following the lead of proactive physicians, the authors support Relman's thesis and education for both students and physicians requires a major overhaul.

摘要

相似文献

1
Physician views on practicing professionalism in the corporate age.
Qual Health Res. 2000 Jul;10(4):490-506. doi: 10.1177/104973200129118598.
2
Physician practice control in the era of managed care.
Compr Ther. 1998 Apr;24(4):205-10.
3
Negotiating. Biases physicians bring to the table.协商。医生在协商中存在的偏见。
Physician Exec. 1996 Dec;22(12):4-7.
4
The managed care world order. The revolution is here.管理式医疗的世界秩序。变革已然来临。
Physician Exec. 1997 May-Jun;23(5):36-8.
5
Managed care hassles--a fact of life?
Manag Care. 1997 Jun;6(6):55-8.
6
The technocratic wish: making sense and finding power in the "managed" medical marketplace.技术官僚的愿望:在“受管控的”医疗市场中理解意义并获取权力。
J Health Polit Policy Law. 1997 Apr;22(2):509-32. doi: 10.1215/03616878-22-2-509.
7
Commentary: professionalism, unionization, and physicians' strikes.述评:专业性、工会化和医生罢工。
Acad Med. 2011 May;86(5):548-51. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e318212a93d.
8
Factors which influence physicians to join labor unions.影响医生加入工会的因素。
J Okla State Med Assoc. 2004 Mar;97(3):114-7.
9
Organizing for effective managed care contracting.
J Med Pract Manage. 2001 Jan-Feb;16(4):194-7.
10
Has managed care changed the skills required for physicians to practice medicine?
Manag Care Q. 1999 Autumn;7(4):20-4.

引用本文的文献

1
General practitioner health and well-being: from Brisbane to Los Angeles.全科医生的健康与福祉:从布里斯班到洛杉矶
West J Med. 2001 Jan;174(1):25-6. doi: 10.1136/ewjm.174.1.25-a.