• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

国家从业者数据库:应对不确定性

The National Practitioner Data Bank: coping with the uncertainties.

作者信息

Lovitky J A

出版信息

J Health Law. 2000 Spring;33(2):355-79.

PMID:11010448
Abstract

The National Practitioner Data Bank is a database of adverse events involving physicians and other practitioners. Querying the database is mandatory for hospitals in several situations. So too, hospitals are required to report specified adverse events. Thus, hospitals need to be able to identify incidents that are reportable events, events that require them to update the databases, and any possible liability issues that may surround the hospital's reporting duties. The author argues that the regulations are unclear in addressing these issues. Likewise, he notes that practitioners should be aware of other problems with the reporting system, including the lack of sufficient Data Bank security.

摘要

国家从业者数据库是一个包含涉及医生和其他从业者不良事件的数据库。在几种情况下,医院必须查询该数据库。同样,医院也被要求报告特定的不良事件。因此,医院需要能够识别可报告事件、需要更新数据库的事件以及围绕医院报告职责可能存在的任何潜在责任问题。作者认为,这些法规在解决这些问题上并不明确。同样,他指出从业者应该意识到报告系统的其他问题,包括数据库安全不足。

相似文献

1
The National Practitioner Data Bank: coping with the uncertainties.国家从业者数据库:应对不确定性
J Health Law. 2000 Spring;33(2):355-79.
2
The Health Care Quality Improvement Act in the courts: fast-acting cure for physician peer review headaches?法庭上的《医疗保健质量改进法案》:快速解决医生同行评审难题的良方?
J Health Hosp Law. 1995 Sep-Oct;28(5):257-68, 312.
3
State medical peer review: high cost but no benefit--is it time for a change?州医学同行评审:成本高昂却无益处——是时候做出改变了吗?
Am J Law Med. 1999;25(1):7-60.
4
Data bank reporting requirements pose vexing issues.数据库报告要求带来了棘手的问题。
Physician Exec. 1992 Jan-Feb;18(1):53-4.
5
Participation in the National Practitioner Data Bank--Department of Veterans Affairs. Final rule.参与国家从业者数据库——退伍军人事务部。最终规则。
Fed Regist. 1991 Oct 28;56(208):55461-4.
6
Adapting to the National Practitioner Data Bank: perspectives for physicians.适应国家执业医师数据库:医师视角
Med Staff Couns. 1991 Fall;5(4):1-9.
7
National Practitioner Data Bank for Adverse Information on Physicians and Other Health Care Practitioners: amendments to data bank regulations to comply with court order and technical correction--HRSA. Final regulations.
Fed Regist. 1994 Dec 1;59(230):61554-5.
8
The National Practitioner Data Bank: the first 18 months.国家从业者数据库:最初的18个月
Physician Exec. 1993 Jan-Feb;19(1):13-7.
9
National Practitioner Data Bank for Adverse Information on Physicians and Other Health Care Practitioners: reporting on adverse and negative actions. Final rule.医师及其他医疗从业者不良信息国家数据库:关于不良和负面行为的报告。最终规则。
Fed Regist. 2010 Jan 28;75(18):4655-82.
10
Hospital liability for defamation of character during the peer review process: sticks and stones may break my bones, but words may cost me my job.医院在同行评审过程中对品格诋毁的责任:棍棒石头可断骨,恶语却能砸饭碗。
Spec Law Dig Health Care (Mon). 1991 Sep(151):7-28.