Consoli S M, Birouste J, Joubert M, Soufi K
Centre de Prévention Sanitaire et Sociale, Caisse Primaire d'Assurance Maladie de la Seine-Saint-Denis, 2 Av. de la Convention, 93017, Bobigny.
Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique. 2000 Aug;48(4):351-62.
The effects of a precarious socioeconomic condition on mental health have already been widely described. Nevertheless, sociodemographic, biographical, and mainly psychological determinants of psychosocial distress in these populations are still incompletely known.
2315 consecutive subjects, aged 16 to 59, consulting for a free work-up in a preventive health center supported by the National French Health Insurance system, were invited to fill out a series of questionnaires, mainly the GHQ-28 (psychosocial distress), the LOT (dispositional optimism) and the WCCL (coping mechanisms). Socioeconomic and administrative criteria were adopted to define populations living in precarious conditions.
A total of 78.9% complete records could be analyzed: 55% of the studied population constituted the precarious condition group (44.5% males and 55.5% females; mean age 36.2+/-11). This group was characterized by higher psychosocial distress and higher sub-scores of anxiety, social dysfunction and depression, but not somatisation, as well as by increased emotion focused coping and impaired optimism. Globally, GHQ score was positively correlated with emotion focused coping (r=0.36) and negatively with problem focused coping (r=-0.17) and with optimism (r=-0.39). In a multivariate analysis a set of 9 independent variables explained 38% of GHQ-28 total variance: perceived stress, optimism, emotion focused coping, problem focused coping, age, educational degree, precariousness, money problems and parental quarrels during youth. Introducing precariousness in the model constituted of the set of the remaining variables could explain only 2% of additional variance.
These results confirm the presence of higher levels of psychosocial distress in subjects living in precarious conditions and underline the moderating role of several psychological variables. They could guide support interventions aimed at helping subjects living in precarious conditions, focused on enhancing their coping resources.
不稳定的社会经济状况对心理健康的影响已得到广泛描述。然而,这些人群中社会心理困扰的社会人口学、个人经历以及主要是心理方面的决定因素仍不完全清楚。
邀请2315名年龄在16至59岁之间、在法国国家健康保险系统支持的预防健康中心接受免费体检的连续就诊者填写一系列问卷,主要包括一般健康问卷-28(社会心理困扰)、生活取向测验( dispositional optimism)和应对方式问卷(应对机制)。采用社会经济和行政标准来界定生活在不稳定状况下的人群。
总共78.9%的完整记录可供分析:55%的研究人群构成不稳定状况组(男性占44.5%,女性占55.5%;平均年龄36.2±11岁)。该组的特点是社会心理困扰程度较高,焦虑、社会功能障碍和抑郁的子分数较高,但躯体化得分不高,同时情绪聚焦应对增加且乐观情绪受损。总体而言,一般健康问卷得分与情绪聚焦应对呈正相关(r = 0.36),与问题聚焦应对呈负相关(r = -0.17),与乐观情绪呈负相关(r = -0.39)。在多变量分析中,一组9个独立变量解释了一般健康问卷-28总分方差的38%:感知压力、乐观情绪、情绪聚焦应对、问题聚焦应对、年龄、教育程度、不稳定状况、金钱问题和青少年时期父母争吵。在由其余变量组成的模型中引入不稳定状况仅能解释2%的额外方差。
这些结果证实生活在不稳定状况下的受试者存在较高水平的社会心理困扰,并强调了几个心理变量的调节作用。它们可以指导旨在帮助生活在不稳定状况下的受试者的支持性干预措施,重点是增强他们的应对资源。