Freudenstein U, Monk P
Leicestershire Health Authority.
Commun Dis Public Health. 2000 Sep;3(3):184-7.
National guidelines offer no clear definition of a close (non-household) contact of tuberculosis. The resulting lack of distinction between close and casual contacts may lead to excessive screening in outbreaks of pulmonary tuberculosis in the United Kingdom. Poor compliance with chemoprophylaxis suggests that priority should be given to the follow up of high risk contacts, who should be more clearly defined. A review of the management of a family outbreak of tuberculosis illustrates the problem. Fifty-nine out of 213 non-household contacts screened for infection had grade 3 and 4 Heaf reactions and none developed clinical tuberculosis within one year. Three of the 59 did not attend for chest radiography and a further 11 patients did not attend the outpatients appointment offered. Twenty-three took chemoprophylaxis for three months, 14 did not complete chemoprophylaxis, six (11%) declined it and two were offered x-ray follow up.
国家指南未对结核病的密切(非家庭成员)接触者给出明确的定义。由此导致的密切接触者与偶然接触者之间缺乏区分,可能会在英国肺结核疫情爆发时导致过度筛查。化学预防的依从性较差,这表明应优先对高危接触者进行随访,且应更明确地界定这些高危接触者。对一起家庭结核病疫情管理情况的回顾说明了这一问题。在接受感染筛查的213名非家庭成员接触者中,59人有3级和4级希夫反应,且一年内无人发展为临床结核病。这59人中,3人未进行胸部X光检查,另有11名患者未参加提供的门诊预约。23人接受了为期三个月的化学预防,14人未完成化学预防,6人(11%)拒绝接受,2人接受了X光随访。