Fitzsimons G J, Williams P
Marketing Department, Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia 19104-6371, USA.
J Exp Psychol Appl. 2000 Sep;6(3):195-206. doi: 10.1037//1076-898x.6.3.195.
The present research uses a technique that permits unique estimation of both automatic and effortful processes in the question-behavior link. Results show that individuals asked to report behavioral intent (vs. those not asked) are more likely to choose options that are highly accessible and positively valenced, regardless of cognitive resources available at the time of processing. This suggests that the effect of intent questions on subsequent behavior is primarily the result of automatic, as opposed to effortful, processing. Practically, this suggests that efforts to debias this robust effect need to affect nonconscious processes and adjust for the automatic impact of being asked an intention question on respondents' behavior.
本研究采用了一种技术,该技术能够对问题与行为之间的联系中的自动过程和刻意过程进行独特的估计。结果表明,被要求报告行为意图的个体(与未被要求的个体相比)更有可能选择那些极易获取且具有积极效价的选项,而不管处理时可用的认知资源如何。这表明意图问题对后续行为的影响主要是自动处理的结果,而非刻意处理的结果。实际上,这表明消除这种强大影响的努力需要影响无意识过程,并针对被问及意图问题对受访者行为的自动影响进行调整。