Gilbert G H, Foerster U, Dolan T A, Duncan R P, Ringelberg M L
School of Dentistry, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Ala., USA.
Caries Res. 2000 Sep-Oct;34(5):367-79. doi: 10.1159/000016611.
To describe for a diverse sample of dentate middle-aged and older adults: (1) the 24-month incidence of coronal caries, and (2) its association with a broad range of clinical, behavioral, financial, attitudinal, and sociodemographic factors.
The Florida Dental Care Study is a prospective observational longitudinal cohort study of 873 persons who at baseline had at least 1 tooth and were 45 years or older. In-person interviews and clinical examinations were conducted at baseline and 24 months, with 6-monthly telephone interviews between those times. A multinomial logistic regression was done to predict whether a participant was in one of four mutually exclusive groups at the 24-month examination (new decay only [NDO]; new filling(s) only [NFO]; both new decay and filling(s) [BOTH]; or neither [NONE]).
Only 33% of the 24-month participants were in the NONE group. There was no significant difference in caries incidence between regular attenders and problem-oriented attenders, regardless of whether teeth crowned at baseline, incident crowns, or incident root fragments were excluded. However, once differences in incident tooth loss and baseline clinical, behavioral, financial, and attitudinal differences were taken into account, regular attenders did appear to benefit by developing fewer coronal lesions and fewer dental symptoms than problem-oriented attenders. Baseline carious surfaces, filled surfaces, number of teeth, and bulk restoration fractures predicted caries incidence, but baseline cusp fractures did not. Persons with negative dental attitudes were more likely to be in the NDO and BOTH groups, and negative attitude toward brushing and flossing (but not their frequency) also predicted caries incidence.
Certain baseline clinical conditions, approach to dental care, ability to pay for dental care, dental attitudes, race, and age group were predictive of coronal caries incidence, and regular attenders appeared to benefit from regular attendance.
针对不同的有牙的中年及老年成年人样本描述:(1)24个月内冠龋的发病率,以及(2)其与一系列广泛的临床、行为、经济、态度和社会人口学因素之间的关联。
佛罗里达牙科护理研究是一项前瞻性观察性纵向队列研究,研究对象为873名基线时至少有1颗牙齿且年龄在45岁及以上的人。在基线和24个月时进行了面对面访谈和临床检查,期间每6个月进行一次电话访谈。进行了多项逻辑回归分析,以预测参与者在24个月检查时是否属于四个相互排斥的组之一(仅新发龋坏[NDO];仅新发充填物[NFO];新发龋坏和充填物均有[BOTH];或两者均无[NONE])。
24个月时的参与者中只有33%属于“无”组。无论是否排除基线时已做牙冠修复的牙齿、新发牙冠或新发牙根碎片,定期就诊者和问题导向型就诊者之间的龋病发病率均无显著差异。然而,一旦考虑到新发牙齿缺失以及基线时临床、行为、经济和态度方面的差异,定期就诊者相较于问题导向型就诊者,新发的冠部病变和牙齿症状确实更少,似乎从中受益。基线龋面、充填面、牙齿数量和大块修复体折断情况可预测龋病发病率,但基线牙尖折断情况则不能。对牙科持消极态度的人更有可能属于NDO组和BOTH组,对刷牙和使用牙线持消极态度(而非其频率)也可预测龋病发病率。
某些基线临床状况、牙科护理方式、支付牙科护理费用的能力、牙科态度、种族和年龄组可预测冠龋发病率,定期就诊者似乎从定期就诊中受益。