Suppr超能文献

北卡罗来纳州老年人三年的冠状龋发病率及危险因素

Three-year coronal caries incidence and risk factors in North Carolina elderly.

作者信息

Drake C W, Beck J D, Lawrence H P, Koch G G

机构信息

Department of Diagnostic Sciences, School of Dentistry, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill 27599-7450, USA.

出版信息

Caries Res. 1997;31(1):1-7. doi: 10.1159/000262365.

Abstract

The data presented in this paper are from the Piedmont 65+ Dental Study (1988-1991), designed to assess the levels of coronal and root caries, periodontal disease, tooth loss, and a variety of dental health-related needs among a representative sample of 234 black and 218 white noninstitutionalized older adults in North Carolina. Of the 452 subjects followed for 3 years, 45% of blacks and 59% of the whites developed new coronal caries when caries was defined as decayed and filled surfaces, decayed root fragments, and crowned surface (p = 0.022). The annualized rate of caries increment for blacks and whites was 0.8 and 1.6 surfaces per 100 at risk (p < 0.001), respectively. The mean 3-year net increment per subject, excluding newly crowned surfaces, was 1.6 and 2.1 (p = 0.025), respectively. Whites had more newly filled and crowned surfaces, whereas blacks had more newly decayed surfaces and more decayed root fragments. Logistic regression models using baseline explanatory variables showed factors related to coronal caries differed between blacks and whites. For blacks, having more teeth, higher concentration of lactobacilli in stimulated saliva, more decayed and filled root surfaces, and smoking were related to the development of new coronal DFS (mostly D). For whites, having more coronal surfaces at risk and having more physical health problems but not seeking medical care in the past 6 months were related to the development of new coronal DFS (mostly F). The study showed the caries attack rate to be higher for whites than blacks, mainly as a result of more crown restorations, whereas blacks appeared to be at greater risk for incident lesions. Thus, in order to obtain more realistic figures for caries risk groups, coronal caries increment can and should be presented including and excluding crowns, since the utilization of dental services is likely to differ between groups of older adults.

摘要

本文所呈现的数据来自皮埃蒙特65岁及以上人群牙科研究(1988 - 1991年),该研究旨在评估北卡罗来纳州234名黑人和218名非机构化白人老年人代表性样本中的冠龋和根龋水平、牙周疾病、牙齿缺失情况以及各种与牙齿健康相关的需求。在随访3年的452名受试者中,当龋病定义为龋坏和充填面、龋坏根面碎片以及冠面时,45%的黑人及59%的白人出现了新的冠龋(p = 0.022)。黑人和白人的龋病年增长率分别为每100名有风险者0.8个面和1.6个面(p < 0.001)。每位受试者3年的平均净增量(不包括新做冠修复的面)分别为1.6个面和2.1个面(p = 0.025)。白人有更多新充填和冠修复的面,而黑人有更多新龋坏的面和更多龋坏根面碎片。使用基线解释变量的逻辑回归模型显示,与冠龋相关的因素在黑人和白人之间存在差异。对于黑人,牙齿数量较多、刺激唾液中乳酸杆菌浓度较高、龋坏和充填根面较多以及吸烟与新的冠面龋失补牙(主要是龋)的发生有关。对于白人,有更多有风险的冠面以及有更多身体健康问题但在过去6个月未就医与新的冠面龋失补牙(主要是补)的发生有关。该研究表明,白人的龋病发病率高于黑人,主要是由于更多的冠修复,而黑人似乎发生新发病变的风险更高。因此,为了获得更符合实际的龋病风险人群数据,冠龋增量可以且应该分别呈现包括和不包括冠修复的情况,因为不同老年人群体的牙科服务利用情况可能存在差异。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验