Suppr超能文献

基于儿科人群的血管性血友病——1型诊断标准及血小板功能分析仪-100和血管性血友病因子/胶原结合试验应用的比较

von Willebrand disease in a pediatric-based population--comparison of type 1 diagnostic criteria and use of the PFA-100 and a von Willebrand factor/collagen-binding assay.

作者信息

Dean J A, Blanchette V S, Carcao M D, Stain A M, Sparling C R, Siekmann J, Turecek P L, Lillicrap D, Rand M L

机构信息

Department of Paediatrics, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Thromb Haemost. 2000 Sep;84(3):401-9.

Abstract

Definitive diagnosis of type 1 von Willebrand Disease (VWD) remains a problem. Provisional consensus guidelines for the diagnosis of definite and possible type 1 VWD were prepared by the Scientific Subcommittee on von Willebrand factor (VWF) of the Scientific and Standardization Committee (SSC) of the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH) during the 1996 annual meeting for the specific purpose of further evaluation in retrospective and prospective studies by a Working Party on Diagnostic Criteria (1996 Annual Report of the SSC/ISTH Subcommittee on VWF). In the first phase of this study, we compared 2 definitions of type 1 VWD. each with 3 criteria: significant bleeding history, laboratory investigations, and family history. Using the ISTH consensus guidelines for type 1 VWD definition, significantly fewer patients were diagnosed with definite type 1 disease as compared to our "in house" Hospital for Sick Children (HSC) criteria (4 vs. 31). While we recognize that the provisional ISTH consensus guidelines were not intended for clinical use, we believe that the results of our studies are of interest and will assist in any future refinements to the ISTH guidelines. In the second phase of this study, we investigated the utility of 2 new tests, a laboratory screening test and a functional test, for VWD in our well characterized, pediatric-based population. The Platelet Function Analyzer (PFA-100) provides an in vitro measure of primary hemostasis under conditions of high shear, using disposable cartridges containing collagen and either epinephrine or ADP. All tested subjects with types 2 or 3 VWD had prolonged PFA-100 closure times (CTs) with both cartridge types (n = 17) and prolonged bleeding times (n = 14). In subjects with definite type 1 VWD, 20/24 (83%) had prolonged CTs with the collagen/ADP cartridge (19/24 (79%) with collagen/epinephrine), compared with 7/26 (27%) with prolonged bleeding times. In subjects with definite types 1, 2, or 3 VWD, collagen/ADP CTs were abnormal in 37/41 subjects, giving an overall sensitivity of 90%. With this high sensitivity, the PFA-100 is a better screening test for VWD than the bleeding time. We also tested a VWF collagen-binding assay (VWF:CBA) as a functional test for VWF, in comparison with the more routinely-used ristocetin cofactor assay (VWF:RC0). The VWF:CBA is based on an ELISA technique, which has the potential to be more reproducible than the VWF:RC0. We found that the VWF:CBA detected 43/49 (88%) subjects with definite types 1, 2, or 3 VWD, performing as well as the VWF:RC0, that detected 42/48 (88%). We also showed that, used in conjunction with VWF antigen levels, the VWF:CBA may be useful in classification of VWD subtypes.

摘要

1型血管性血友病(VWD)的明确诊断仍然是一个难题。国际血栓与止血学会(ISTH)科学与标准化委员会(SSC)的血管性血友病因子(VWF)科学小组委员会在1996年年会期间制定了1型VWD确诊和疑似诊断的临时共识指南,目的是供诊断标准工作小组在回顾性和前瞻性研究中进行进一步评估(ISTH SSC/VWF小组委员会1996年年度报告)。在本研究的第一阶段,我们比较了1型VWD的两种定义,每种定义都有三个标准:显著的出血史、实验室检查和家族史。根据ISTH关于1型VWD定义的共识指南,与我们“内部”的病童医院(HSC)标准相比,确诊为1型疾病的患者明显更少(4例对31例)。虽然我们认识到ISTH的临时共识指南并非用于临床,但我们认为我们的研究结果很有意义,将有助于未来对ISTH指南的完善。在本研究的第二阶段,我们在特征明确的儿科人群中研究了两种新检测方法(一种实验室筛查试验和一种功能试验)对VWD的效用。血小板功能分析仪(PFA - 100)使用含有胶原蛋白和肾上腺素或二磷酸腺苷(ADP)的一次性检测卡,在高剪切条件下对初级止血进行体外测量。所有检测的2型或3型VWD受试者使用两种检测卡时PFA - 100封闭时间(CT)均延长(n = 17),出血时间也延长(n = 14)。在确诊为1型VWD的受试者中,20/24(占83%)使用胶原蛋白/ADP检测卡时CT延长(19/24(占79%)使用胶原蛋白/肾上腺素检测卡时CT延长),而出血时间延长的为7/26(占27%)。在确诊为1型、2型或3型VWD的受试者中,37/41的受试者胶原蛋白/ADP CT异常。总体敏感性为90%。由于具有这种高敏感性,PFA - 100对VWD的筛查试验比出血时间更好。我们还测试了VWF胶原结合试验(VWF:CBA)作为VWF的功能试验,并与更常用的瑞斯托霉素辅因子试验(VWF:RCo)进行比较。VWF:CBA基于酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)技术,其重现性可能比VWF:RCo更好。我们发现VWF:CBA检测出43/49(占88%)确诊为1型、2型或3型VWD的受试者,与VWF:RCo检测出42/48(占88%)的表现相当。我们还表明,与VWF抗原水平联合使用时,VWF:CBA可能有助于VWD亚型的分类。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验