• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

接受冠状动脉支架置入术的女性和男性在预后因素及结果方面的差异。

Differences in prognostic factors and outcomes between women and men undergoing coronary artery stenting.

作者信息

Mehilli J, Kastrati A, Dirschinger J, Bollwein H, Neumann F J, Schömig A

机构信息

Deutsches Herzzentrum, Lazarettstr 36, 80636 Munich, Germany.

出版信息

JAMA. 2000 Oct 11;284(14):1799-805. doi: 10.1001/jama.284.14.1799.

DOI:10.1001/jama.284.14.1799
PMID:11025832
Abstract

CONTEXT

Women with coronary artery disease (CAD) are believed to have a higher risk for adverse outcomes than men after conventional coronary interventions. The increasing use of coronary stenting has improved the outcome of patients undergoing coronary interventions, but little is known about the nature of outcomes in men vs women after this procedure.

OBJECTIVE

To examine whether there are sex-based differences in prognostic factors and in early and late outcomes among CAD patients undergoing coronary stent placement.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: Inception cohort study, at 2 tertiary referral institutions in Germany. Consecutive series of 1001 women and 3263 men with symptomatic CAD who were treated with stenting between May 1992 and December 1998. Patients who underwent stenting in the setting of acute myocardial infarction were excluded.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

The combined event rates of death and nonfatal myocardial infarction, assessed at 30 days and 1 year after stenting and compared by sex.

RESULTS

Compared with men, women undergoing coronary stenting were significantly older (mean age, 69 vs 63 years) and more likely to present with diabetes, arterial hypertension, or hypercholesterolemia. Women had less extensive CAD, a less frequent history of myocardial infarction and better preserved left ventricular function than men. Women presented an excess risk of death or nonfatal myocardial infarction only during the early period after stenting: the 30-day combined event rate of death or myocardial infarction was 3.1% in women and 1.8% in men (P =.02) and the multivariate-adjusted hazard ratio (HR) for women was 2.02 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.27-3.19). At 1 year, the outcome was similar for both women and men (combined event rate for women, 6.0%, and for men, 5.8% (P =.77); multivariate-adjusted HR for women, 1.06 [95% CI, 0.75-1.48]). There was a sex difference in the prognostic value of baseline characteristics: the strongest prognostic factors were diabetes in women and age in men.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study indicate that 1-year outcomes of women with CAD undergoing coronary artery stenting are similar to those of men. Despite the similarity in outcomes, there are several sex-specific differences in baseline characteristics, clinical course after the intervention, and relative weight of prognostic factors. JAMA. 2000;284:1799-1805.

摘要

背景

一般认为,患有冠状动脉疾病(CAD)的女性在接受传统冠状动脉介入治疗后出现不良后果的风险高于男性。冠状动脉支架置入术的使用日益增加,改善了接受冠状动脉介入治疗患者的预后,但对于接受该手术后男性和女性的预后性质知之甚少。

目的

研究接受冠状动脉支架置入术的CAD患者在预后因素以及早期和晚期预后方面是否存在性别差异。

设计、地点和患者:在德国两家三级转诊机构进行的队列起始研究。1992年5月至1998年12月期间连续收治的1001例有症状CAD女性患者和3263例有症状CAD男性患者,均接受了支架置入治疗。排除在急性心肌梗死情况下接受支架置入的患者。

主要观察指标

评估支架置入后30天和1年时死亡和非致命性心肌梗死的联合事件发生率,并按性别进行比较。

结果

与男性相比,接受冠状动脉支架置入术的女性年龄显著更大(平均年龄69岁对63岁),更有可能患有糖尿病、动脉高血压或高胆固醇血症。与男性相比,女性的CAD病变范围较小,心肌梗死病史较少,左心室功能保留较好。女性仅在支架置入后的早期存在死亡或非致命性心肌梗死的额外风险:女性30天死亡或心肌梗死的联合事件发生率为3.1%,男性为1.8%(P = 0.02),女性的多变量调整风险比(HR)为2.02(95%置信区间[CI],1.27 - 3.19)。在1年时,女性和男性的预后相似(女性联合事件发生率为6.0%,男性为5.8%(P = 0.77);女性的多变量调整HR为1.06[95% CI,0.75 - 1.48])。基线特征的预后价值存在性别差异:女性中最强的预后因素是糖尿病,男性中是年龄。

结论

本研究结果表明,接受冠状动脉支架置入术的CAD女性患者1年的预后与男性相似。尽管预后相似,但在基线特征、干预后的临床过程以及预后因素的相对权重方面存在一些性别特异性差异。《美国医学会杂志》。2000年;284:1799 - 1805。

相似文献

1
Differences in prognostic factors and outcomes between women and men undergoing coronary artery stenting.接受冠状动脉支架置入术的女性和男性在预后因素及结果方面的差异。
JAMA. 2000 Oct 11;284(14):1799-805. doi: 10.1001/jama.284.14.1799.
2
Results of coronary artery stenting in women versus men: a single center experience.女性与男性冠状动脉支架置入术的结果:单中心经验
Isr Med Assoc J. 2003 Jun;5(6):398-402.
3
Benefit of an early invasive management strategy in women with acute coronary syndromes.急性冠状动脉综合征女性患者早期侵入性管理策略的益处。
JAMA. 2002 Dec 25;288(24):3124-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.288.24.3124.
4
Sex-associated differences in clinical outcomes after coronary stenting in patients with diabetes mellitus.糖尿病患者冠状动脉支架置入术后临床结局的性别差异
Am J Med. 2004 Dec 1;117(11):830-6. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2004.02.036.
5
Short- and long-term outcomes of coronary stenting in women versus men: results from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry Centers for Medicare & Medicaid services cohort.女性与男性冠状动脉支架置入术的短期和长期结局:来自美国医疗保险和医疗补助服务国家心血管数据注册中心队列的研究结果。
Circulation. 2012 Oct 30;126(18):2190-9. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.111369. Epub 2012 Sep 17.
6
Outcome of elderly patients with chronic symptomatic coronary artery disease with an invasive vs optimized medical treatment strategy: one-year results of the randomized TIME trial.老年慢性症状性冠状动脉疾病患者采用侵入性治疗与优化药物治疗策略的结果:随机TIME试验的一年结果
JAMA. 2003 Mar 5;289(9):1117-23. doi: 10.1001/jama.289.9.1117.
7
Comparison of mortality rates in women versus men presenting with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.比较女性与男性 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者的死亡率。
Am J Cardiol. 2011 Mar 1;107(5):651-4. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2010.10.038. Epub 2010 Dec 31.
8
Impact of sex on 3-year outcome after percutaneous coronary intervention using bare-metal and drug-eluting stents in previously untreated coronary artery disease: insights from the RESEARCH (Rapamycin-Eluting Stent Evaluated at Rotterdam Cardiology Hospital) and T-SEARCH (Taxus-Stent Evaluated at Rotterdam Cardiology Hospital) Registries.性别对既往未经治疗的冠状动脉疾病患者使用裸金属支架和药物洗脱支架进行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后3年预后的影响:来自RESEARCH(鹿特丹心脏病医院雷帕霉素洗脱支架评估)和T-SEARCH(鹿特丹心脏病医院紫杉醇支架评估)注册研究的见解
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2009 Jul;2(7):603-10. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2009.03.016.
9
Long-term outcome of provisional side-branch T-stenting for the treatment of unprotected distal left main coronary artery disease.为治疗无保护左主干冠状动脉远端病变而行的边支 T 型支架术的长期疗效。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2011 May 1;77(6):765-72. doi: 10.1002/ccd.22899. Epub 2011 Mar 16.
10
A comparative analysis of major clinical outcomes with drug-eluting stents versus bare metal stents in male versus female patients.比较药物洗脱支架与裸金属支架在男性与女性患者中的主要临床结局。
EuroIntervention. 2012 Jan;7(9):1051-9. doi: 10.4244/EIJV7I9A167.

引用本文的文献

1
Long-term mortality after coronary surgery in women patients depend on diabetes and age.女性患者冠状动脉手术后的长期死亡率取决于糖尿病和年龄。
Interdiscip Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2025 Mar 29;40(4). doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivaf069.
2
Gender bias in acute myocardial infarction care in India: Nationwide retrospective study of 41832 patients.印度急性心肌梗死治疗中的性别偏见:对41832例患者的全国性回顾性研究。
Indian Heart J. 2025 Jan-Feb;77(1):22-27. doi: 10.1016/j.ihj.2025.01.001. Epub 2025 Jan 7.
3
Bridging Care Gaps for Older Women Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.
为行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的老年女性患者搭建护理桥梁。
Interv Cardiol Clin. 2025 Jan;14(1):69-79. doi: 10.1016/j.iccl.2024.08.006.
4
Sex differences in coronary artery bypass grafting-related morbidity and mortality.冠状动脉搭桥术相关发病率和死亡率的性别差异。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Nov 29;9:1021363. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.1021363. eCollection 2022.
5
Is There Still a Sex Difference According to the Coronary Revascularization Strategy?根据冠状动脉血运重建策略,性别差异是否依然存在?
JACC Asia. 2022 Jan 4;2(1):30-32. doi: 10.1016/j.jacasi.2021.10.002. eCollection 2022 Feb.
6
Role of bilirubin in the prognosis of coronary artery disease and its relationship with cardiovascular risk factors: a meta-analysis.胆红素在冠状动脉疾病预后中的作用及其与心血管危险因素的关系:一项荟萃分析。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2022 Nov 2;22(1):458. doi: 10.1186/s12872-022-02899-w.
7
Factors Associated with Non-Severe Adverse Reactions after Vaccination against SARS-CoV-2: A Cohort Study of 908,869 Outpatient Vaccinations in Germany.2019冠状病毒病疫苗接种后非严重不良反应的相关因素:德国908,869例门诊疫苗接种队列研究
Vaccines (Basel). 2022 Apr 6;10(4):566. doi: 10.3390/vaccines10040566.
8
Sex Differences in the Clinical Features and Outcomes of Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome Treated with Two Generations (Absorb and Magmaris) of Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffolds.两代(Absorb和Magmaris)生物可吸收血管支架治疗急性冠状动脉综合征患者的临床特征和预后的性别差异
J Clin Med. 2021 Aug 24;10(17):3768. doi: 10.3390/jcm10173768.
9
Gender differences in quality of life in coronary artery disease patients with comorbidities undergoing coronary revascularization.合并症行冠状动脉血运重建术的冠心病患者生存质量的性别差异。
PLoS One. 2020 Jun 17;15(6):e0234543. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0234543. eCollection 2020.
10
Persistent sex disparities in clinical outcomes with percutaneous coronary intervention: Insights from 6.6 million PCI procedures in the United States.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中持续性的临床结局性别差异:来自美国 660 万例经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的分析。
PLoS One. 2018 Sep 4;13(9):e0203325. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0203325. eCollection 2018.