• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中持续性的临床结局性别差异:来自美国 660 万例经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的分析。

Persistent sex disparities in clinical outcomes with percutaneous coronary intervention: Insights from 6.6 million PCI procedures in the United States.

机构信息

Keele Cardiovascular Research Group, Centre for Prognosis Research, Institute of Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, Stoke-on-Trent, United Kingdom.

University College London Hospitals and St Bartholomew's Hospital, London, United Kingdom.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2018 Sep 4;13(9):e0203325. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0203325. eCollection 2018.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0203325
PMID:30180201
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6122817/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Prior studies have reported inconsistencies in the baseline risk profile, comorbidity burden and their association with clinical outcomes in women compared to men. More importantly, there is limited data around the sex differences and how these have changed over time in contemporary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) practice.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We used the Nationwide Inpatient Sample to identify all PCI procedures based on ICD-9 procedure codes in the United States between 2004-2014 in adult patients. Descriptive statistics were used to describe sex-based differences in baseline characteristics and comorbidity burden of patients. Multivariable logistic regressions were used to investigate the association between these differences and in-hospital mortality, complications, length of stay and total hospital charges. Among 6,601,526 patients, 66% were men and 33% were women. Women were more likely to be admitted with diagnosis of NSTEMI (non-ST elevation acute myocardial infarction), were on average 5 years older (median age 68 compared to 63) and had higher burden of comorbidity defined by Charlson score ≥3. Women also had higher in-hospital crude mortality (2.0% vs 1.4%) and any complications compared to men (11.1% vs 7.0%). These trends persisted in our adjusted analyses where women had a significant increase in the odds of in-hospital mortality men (OR 1.20 (95% CI 1.16,1.23) and major bleeding (OR 1.81 (95% CI 1.77,1.86).

CONCLUSION

In this national unselected contemporary PCI cohort, there are significant sex-based differences in presentation, baseline characteristics and comorbidity burden. These differences do not fully account for the higher in-hospital mortality and procedural complications observed in women.

摘要

背景

先前的研究报告称,与男性相比,女性在基线风险特征、合并症负担及其与临床结局的关系方面存在不一致之处。更重要的是,关于性别差异的数据有限,以及这些差异在当代经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)实践中是如何随时间变化的。

方法和结果

我们使用全国住院患者样本,在美国 2004-2014 年期间,根据 ICD-9 手术代码识别所有 PCI 手术。描述性统计数据用于描述患者基线特征和合并症负担方面的性别差异。多变量逻辑回归用于调查这些差异与住院死亡率、并发症、住院时间和总住院费用之间的关联。在 6601526 名患者中,66%为男性,33%为女性。女性更有可能因 NSTEMI(非 ST 段抬高型急性心肌梗死)入院,平均年龄大 5 岁(中位数年龄为 68 岁,而男性为 63 岁),Charlson 评分≥3 定义的合并症负担更高。女性的住院死亡率(2.0%比 1.4%)和任何并发症(11.1%比 7.0%)也高于男性。这些趋势在我们的调整分析中仍然存在,女性的住院死亡率比男性显著增加(比值比 1.20(95%置信区间 1.16,1.23)和大出血(比值比 1.81(95%置信区间 1.77,1.86)。

结论

在这个全国性的未选择的当代 PCI 队列中,在表现、基线特征和合并症负担方面存在显著的性别差异。这些差异并不能完全解释女性观察到的更高的住院死亡率和手术并发症。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1a8f/6122817/8108d5ce259b/pone.0203325.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1a8f/6122817/fdb2ff844ae7/pone.0203325.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1a8f/6122817/44c3116cff5a/pone.0203325.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1a8f/6122817/8108d5ce259b/pone.0203325.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1a8f/6122817/fdb2ff844ae7/pone.0203325.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1a8f/6122817/44c3116cff5a/pone.0203325.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1a8f/6122817/8108d5ce259b/pone.0203325.g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Persistent sex disparities in clinical outcomes with percutaneous coronary intervention: Insights from 6.6 million PCI procedures in the United States.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中持续性的临床结局性别差异:来自美国 660 万例经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的分析。
PLoS One. 2018 Sep 4;13(9):e0203325. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0203325. eCollection 2018.
2
Trends of Incidence, Clinical Presentation, and In-Hospital Mortality Among Women With Acute Myocardial Infarction With or Without Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection: A Population-Based Analysis.急性心肌梗死伴或不伴自发性冠状动脉夹层女性患者的发病率、临床表现和住院死亡率趋势:一项基于人群的分析。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Jan 8;11(1):80-90. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2017.08.016. Epub 2017 Dec 13.
3
Contemporary Sex-Based Differences by Age in Presenting Characteristics, Use of an Early Invasive Strategy, and Inhospital Mortality in Patients With Non-ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction in the United States.当代美国非 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者按年龄分组的临床表现、早期侵入性治疗策略应用和住院死亡率的性别差异。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Jan;11(1):e005735. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.117.005735.
4
Age-Stratified Sex Disparities in Care and Outcomes in Patients With ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction.年龄分层的 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者的护理和结局的性别差异。
Am J Med. 2020 Nov;133(11):1293-1301.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2020.03.059. Epub 2020 May 15.
5
Sex-related differences after contemporary primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.当代ST段抬高型心肌梗死直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后的性别差异
Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2015 Aug-Sep;108(8-9):428-36. doi: 10.1016/j.acvd.2015.03.002. Epub 2015 Apr 27.
6
Smoker's Paradox in Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.接受直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者中的吸烟者悖论
J Am Heart Assoc. 2016 Apr 22;5(4):e003370. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.116.003370.
7
Early versus delayed percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes.非ST段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征患者早期与延迟经皮冠状动脉介入治疗
Coron Artery Dis. 2016 Aug;27(5):344-9. doi: 10.1097/MCA.0000000000000374.
8
Early Invasive Versus Initial Conservative Strategies for Women with Non-ST-Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes: A Nationwide Analysis.非 ST 段抬高急性冠状动脉综合征女性的早期侵入性与初始保守策略:一项全国性分析。
Am J Med. 2017 Sep;130(9):1059-1067. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2017.01.049. Epub 2017 Feb 24.
9
Sex Differences in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention-Insights From the Coronary Angiography and PCI Registry of the German Society of Cardiology.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中的性别差异——来自德国心脏病学会冠状动脉造影和PCI注册研究的见解
J Am Heart Assoc. 2017 Mar 20;6(3):e004972. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.116.004972.
10
Effect of sex difference in clinical presentation (stable coronary artery disease vs unstable angina pectoris or non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction vs ST-elevation myocardial infarction) on 2-year outcomes in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者中,临床表现的性别差异(稳定型冠状动脉疾病与不稳定型心绞痛或非ST段抬高型心肌梗死与ST段抬高型心肌梗死)对2年预后的影响。
J Interv Cardiol. 2018 Feb;31(1):5-14. doi: 10.1111/joic.12451. Epub 2017 Oct 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Klotho plasma levels are an independent predictorof mortality in women with acute coronary syndrome.在患有急性冠状动脉综合征的女性中,血浆α-klotho水平是死亡率的独立预测指标。
Sci Rep. 2025 May 14;15(1):16744. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-01334-2.
2
Sex-based Differences in Complications Following Percutaneous Coronary Interventions.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后并发症的性别差异。
Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2025 Feb 17;27(1):33. doi: 10.1007/s11883-025-01278-y.
3
Time Trends in Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Meta-Analysis on Sex Differences.

本文引用的文献

1
Differences in management and outcomes for men and women with ST-elevation myocardial infarction.男性和女性 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者的管理和结局存在差异。
Med J Aust. 2018 Aug 6;209(3):118-123. doi: 10.5694/mja17.01109. Epub 2018 Jul 23.
2
Outcomes After Coronary Stenting or Bypass Surgery for Men and Women With Unprotected Left Main Disease: The EXCEL Trial.男性和女性无保护左主干病变患者行冠状动脉支架置入术或旁路手术的结果:EXCEL 试验。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Jul 9;11(13):1234-1243. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2018.03.051.
3
Sex-Related Differences in Short- and Long-Term Outcome among Young and Middle-Aged Patients for ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Underwent Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.
经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后主要不良心血管事件的时间趋势:性别差异的荟萃分析
JACC Adv. 2025 Jan 8;4(2):101526. doi: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2024.101526. eCollection 2025 Feb.
4
Sex-Based Differences and Outcomes in Unselected Patients Undergoing Coronary Angiography.接受冠状动脉造影的未筛选患者中的性别差异与预后
J Clin Med. 2025 Jan 2;14(1):224. doi: 10.3390/jcm14010224.
5
Sex Differences in Patients Undergoing Left Main Stem Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Stable Angina: Data From a National Registry.稳定型心绞痛患者行左主干经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的性别差异:来自全国注册登记研究的数据。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2024 Nov 19;13(22):e036569. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.124.036569. Epub 2024 Nov 15.
6
Bridging Care Gaps for Older Women Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.为行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的老年女性患者搭建护理桥梁。
Interv Cardiol Clin. 2025 Jan;14(1):69-79. doi: 10.1016/j.iccl.2024.08.006.
7
Sex Difference in 5-year Relative Survival Following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后5年相对生存率的性别差异
Eur Cardiol. 2024 Oct 2;19:e18. doi: 10.15420/ecr.2024.25. eCollection 2024.
8
Trends in primary percutaneous coronary intervention for the treatment of acute coronary ST-elevation myocardial infarction in Latin American countries: insights from the CECI consortium.拉丁美洲国家急性冠状动脉ST段抬高型心肌梗死的主要经皮冠状动脉介入治疗趋势:CECI联盟的见解
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2024 May 17;11:1275907. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1275907. eCollection 2024.
9
Narrowing disparities in PCI outcomes in women; From risk assessment, to referral pathways and outcomes.女性经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)结果方面差距的缩小;从风险评估到转诊途径及结果。
Am Heart J Plus. 2022 Nov 5;24:100225. doi: 10.1016/j.ahjo.2022.100225. eCollection 2022 Dec.
10
Sex Disparities in Cardiovascular Disease.心血管疾病中的性别差异。
Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J. 2024 Mar 14;20(2):107-119. doi: 10.14797/mdcvj.1328. eCollection 2024.
性别对中青年 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗短期和长期结局的影响。
Chin Med J (Engl). 2018 Jun 20;131(12):1420-1429. doi: 10.4103/0366-6999.233965.
4
Sex differences in the outcome after percutaneous coronary intervention - A propensity matching analysis.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后结局的性别差异——倾向匹配分析
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2019 Feb;20(2):101-107. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2018.05.010. Epub 2018 May 24.
5
Sex disparities in acute myocardial infarction care and outcomes.急性心肌梗死治疗和结局的性别差异。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Nov 1;92(5):E341-E347. doi: 10.1002/ccd.27622. Epub 2018 May 10.
6
Gender is Not a Predictor of Mortality or Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Acute Coronary Syndromes.性别并非急性冠脉综合征患者接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗时死亡率或主要不良心血管事件的预测因素。
Heart Lung Circ. 2019 May;28(5):727-734. doi: 10.1016/j.hlc.2018.03.020. Epub 2018 Apr 4.
7
Sex Differences in Outcomes After STEMI: Effect Modification by Treatment Strategy and Age.STEMI 后结局的性别差异:治疗策略和年龄的调节作用。
JAMA Intern Med. 2018 May 1;178(5):632-639. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.0514.
8
Sex differences in left main coronary artery stenting: Different characteristics but similar outcomes for women compared with men.左主干冠状动脉支架置入术的性别差异:女性与男性相比,具有不同的特征但结局相似。
Int J Cardiol. 2018 Feb 15;253:50-54. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.06.051.
9
Frailty and Mortality Outcomes After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后衰弱与死亡率结局:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2017 Dec 1;18(12):1097.e1-1097.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2017.09.002. Epub 2017 Nov 1.
10
Temporal Trends, Complications, and Predictors of Outcomes Among Nonagenarians Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Insights From the Veterans Affairs Clinical Assessment, Reporting, and Tracking Program.90 岁以上人群行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的时间趋势、并发症和结局预测因素:来自退伍军人事务临床评估、报告和跟踪计划的见解。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Jul 10;10(13):1295-1303. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2017.03.051.