Shahmanesh M, Gayed S, Ashcroft M, Smith R, Roopnarainsingh R, Dunn J, Ross J
Whittall Street Clinic, Birmingham.
Sex Transm Infect. 2000 Aug;76(4):268-72. doi: 10.1136/sti.76.4.268.
To investigate if the core population hypothesis is applicable to patients with genital chlamydia infections.
Retrospective cross sectional study.
Two genitourinary medicine (GUM) clinics in the city of Birmingham and eight adjacent clinics.
All patients with chlamydia (n = 665) or gonorrhoea (n = 584) attending between 1 October 1995 and 30 September 1996 with a postcode within the Birmingham health district. Controls were 727 patients seen in the same period with no infection.
Postcodes were used to calculate population prevalence rates per 100,000 aged 15-65 in the 39 wards of the city and to estimate the socioeconomic status using the Super Profile (SP). Ethnic specific rates were also calculated. Data were obtained on gonorrhoea and chlamydia isolation from all the major laboratories of the city over the same time period.
GUM clinic attenders accounted for 67.6% and 82.5% of all chlamydia and gonorrhoea isolates reported by the laboratories and that were available for our epidemiological analysis. Both infections were more common in men and in black ethnic groups. However, patients with gonorrhoea only infection were more likely to be of black ethnicity than those with chlamydia only infection (p = 0.0001) and to have different SP distribution (p = 0.0001). On logistic regression age < 20 years, male sex, black ethnicity, and living in neighbourhoods with SP J ("have nots") were predictive of both infections compared with controls. Overall chlamydia and gonorrhoea prevalence rates were 129 and 98.4 per 10(5) respectively. Corresponding rates for whites was 64.7 and 37.2 and for black ethnic groups 1105 and 1183 per 10(5) of each ethnic group. Eight adjacent wards accounted for 41% of the chlamydia and 66.5% of the gonorrhoea.
In a large urban setting patients attending GUM clinics with chlamydia belong to core population groups with similar, but not identical, sociodemographic characteristics to patients with gonorrhoea infection.
调查核心人群假说是否适用于生殖器衣原体感染患者。
回顾性横断面研究。
伯明翰市的两家泌尿生殖医学(GUM)诊所及八家相邻诊所。
1995年10月1日至1996年9月30日期间在伯明翰健康区邮编范围内就诊的所有衣原体感染患者(n = 665)或淋病患者(n = 584)。对照组为同期就诊的727名未感染患者。
利用邮编计算该市39个病房中每10万15 - 65岁人群的患病率,并使用超级概况(SP)评估社会经济地位。还计算了特定种族的患病率。同时从该市所有主要实验室获取同一时期淋病和衣原体分离情况的数据。
GUM诊所就诊者占实验室报告的、可供我们进行流行病学分析的所有衣原体和淋病分离株的67.6%和82.5%。两种感染在男性和黑人种族中更为常见。然而,仅感染淋病的患者比仅感染衣原体的患者更可能为黑人种族(p = 0.0001),且具有不同的SP分布(p = 0.0001)。与对照组相比,逻辑回归分析显示年龄<20岁、男性、黑人种族以及居住在SP J(“贫困者”)社区与两种感染均相关。总体衣原体和淋病患病率分别为每10万人口129例和98.4例。白人的相应患病率为每10万人口64.7例和37.2例,黑人种族分别为每10万人口1105例和1183例。八个相邻病房的衣原体感染病例占41%,淋病感染病例占66.5%。
在大型城市环境中,到GUM诊所就诊的衣原体感染患者属于核心人群,其社会人口学特征与淋病感染患者相似,但不完全相同。