Simonian P T, Erickson M S, Larson R V, O'kane J W
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Arthroscopy. 2000 Oct;16(7):707-14. doi: 10.1053/jars.2000.4635.
In this study, we compared a study group of 20 patients who underwent anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction with hamstring autografts using a 1-incision endoscopic technique verses a control group of 20 patients using a 2-incision technique. The patient groups were compared based on increase of bone tunnel diameter seen radiographically, physical examination, and arthrometer measurements. The 1-incision technique differed from the 2-incision technique in 2 ways: an EndoButton femoral fixation system and drilling of the femoral tunnel through the tibial tunnel (transtibial). This study shows that the majority of tunnel diameter measurements for the 1-incision ACL reconstruction technique were greater than those of the 2-incision ACL reconstruction technique using autologous hamstring tendons, at both 3 and 12 months of follow-up. Between 3 and 12 months follow-up, there was no statistical differences in tunnel enlargement between the 2 groups of patients. The measured tunnel enlargement, therefore, would have occurred before the 3-month follow-up. There was no significant difference in the Lachman or arthrometer testing in either group of patients at the termination of this study. This indicates that, although tunnel expansion is significant, the increased expansion is not related to increased knee laxity in the first year.
