Suppr超能文献

加巴喷丁与阿米替林治疗痛性糖尿病神经病变的开放标签试验研究

Gabapentin vs. amitriptyline in painful diabetic neuropathy: an open-label pilot study.

作者信息

Dallocchio C, Buffa C, Mazzarello P, Chiroli S

机构信息

Department of Neurology and Rehabilitative Medicine, S. Giacomo Hospital, Novi Ligure, Italy.

出版信息

J Pain Symptom Manage. 2000 Oct;20(4):280-5. doi: 10.1016/s0885-3924(00)00181-0.

Abstract

The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy and tolerability of gabapentin and amitriptyline monotherapy in painful diabetic neuropathy. This was a 12-week, open-label, prospective, randomized trial. Twenty-five type-II diabetic patients with pain attributed to diabetic neuropathy and a minimum score of 2 on a pain intensity scale ranging from 0 (no pain) to 4 (excruciating pain) were randomized to receive either gabapentin, titrated from 1,200 mg/day to a maximum of 2,400 mg/day, or amitriptyline, titrated from 30 mg/day to a maximum of 90 mg/day. Both drugs were titrated over a 4-week period and maintained at the maximum tolerated dose for 8 weeks. The main outcome measures were weekly pain intensity and paresthesia intensity, measured on two categorical scales. Thirteen patients received gabapentin and 12 received amitriptyline. All 25 patients completed the trial. Gabapentin produced greater pain reductions than amitriptyline (mean final scores were 1.9 vs. 1.3 points below baseline scores; P = 0.026). Decreases in paresthesia scores also were in favor of gabapentin (1.8 vs. 0.9 points; P = 0. 004). Adverse events were more frequent in the amitriptyline group than in the gabapentin group: they were reported by 11/12 (92%) and 4/13 (31%) of patients, respectively (P = 0.003). Side effects were the main limiting factor preventing dose escalation. Gabapentin produced greater improvements than amitriptyline in pain and paresthesia associated with diabetic neuropathy. Additionally, gabapentin was better tolerated than amitriptyline. Further controlled trials are needed to confirm these preliminary results.

摘要

本研究的目的是比较加巴喷丁和阿米替林单一疗法治疗痛性糖尿病神经病变的疗效和耐受性。这是一项为期12周的开放标签前瞻性随机试验。25例因糖尿病神经病变导致疼痛且疼痛强度评分(范围为0分[无疼痛]至4分[剧痛])至少为2分的II型糖尿病患者被随机分为两组,分别接受加巴喷丁治疗(剂量从1200毫克/天滴定至最大剂量2400毫克/天)或阿米替林治疗(剂量从30毫克/天滴定至最大剂量90毫克/天)。两种药物均在4周内进行滴定,并在最大耐受剂量下维持8周。主要结局指标是每周的疼痛强度和感觉异常强度,通过两个分类量表进行测量。13例患者接受加巴喷丁治疗,12例患者接受阿米替林治疗。所有25例患者均完成了试验。加巴喷丁比阿米替林能更有效地减轻疼痛(最终平均得分比基线得分分别低1.9分和1.3分;P = 0.026)。感觉异常评分的降低也有利于加巴喷丁(分别为1.8分和0.9分;P = 0.004)。阿米替林组的不良事件比加巴喷丁组更频繁:分别有11/12(92%)和4/13(31%)的患者报告了不良事件(P = 0.003)。副作用是限制剂量增加的主要因素。加巴喷丁在改善糖尿病神经病变相关的疼痛和感觉异常方面比阿米替林更有效。此外,加巴喷丁的耐受性优于阿米替林。需要进一步的对照试验来证实这些初步结果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验