Karetzky M S
Medicine (Baltimore). 1975 Nov;54(6):471-84.
This analysis of asthma mortality has emphasized the roles played in its pathogenesis by different modes of therapy as reported in the literature. In addition attention was directed towards yet another potentially lethal therapeutic modality, IPPB, the efficacy and potential benefits of which are critically questioned. IPPB treatments were related to every fatal episode of asthma which made up the entire asthma mortality experience during a 12 month period at Morrisania Hospital. The adverse consequences of IPPB therapy were reviewed and it was further suggested that its use in acute asthma attacks was related to lethal episodes of hypoxia and pneumothorax. The patient must, in order to trigger an IPPB apparatus, create a pre-determined negative pressure to initiate inflation. The machine may, therefore, be ineffective in a patient with severe obstruction and greatly increased airway resistance either because of the inability to trigger it or with adequate triggering the subsequent delivery of an inadequate tidal volume at the pressure limitation set. Thus, severe hypercapnia and hypoxia may result especially if oxygen enriched gas mixtures are not used. This may occur even with the delivery of an adequate tidal volume since its distribution within the lungs is poor resulting in a worsening of ventilation-perfusion relationships as evidenced by an increase in the measured physiologic dead space. This experience and review of the literature suggests that IPPB treatment in asthma, especially during an acute attack, should always be administered with small doses of nebulized bronchodilators and oxygen with careful monitoring of arterial blood gases. This will allow for the detection of the adverse effects of this mode of therapy which may exceed the hoped for benefits, the most important being bronchodilatation and subsequent mobilization of secretions with continued treatment.
正如文献报道的那样,这项哮喘死亡率分析强调了不同治疗方式在其发病机制中所起的作用。此外,人们还关注了另一种潜在致命的治疗方式——间歇正压通气(IPPB),其疗效和潜在益处受到了严重质疑。在莫里斯ania医院为期12个月的时间里,所有致命的哮喘发作事件都与IPPB治疗有关,这些发作事件构成了整个哮喘死亡情况。本文回顾了IPPB治疗的不良后果,并进一步指出,在急性哮喘发作中使用IPPB与缺氧和气胸致死事件有关。患者必须产生一个预先设定的负压来启动IPPB装置,才能触发该装置。因此,对于严重气道阻塞和气道阻力大幅增加的患者,该装置可能无效,原因要么是无法触发,要么是在设定的压力限制下,即使触发成功,随后输送的潮气量也不足。因此,特别是在不使用富氧气体混合物的情况下,可能会导致严重的高碳酸血症和缺氧。即使输送的潮气量足够,这种情况也可能发生,因为其在肺内的分布不佳,导致通气/血流关系恶化,这可通过测量的生理死腔增加得到证明。这一经验以及对文献的回顾表明,在哮喘治疗中,尤其是在急性发作期间,IPPB治疗应始终与小剂量雾化支气管扩张剂和氧气联合使用,并仔细监测动脉血气。这样可以检测出这种治疗方式可能超过预期益处的不良影响,其中最重要的是支气管扩张以及持续治疗后分泌物的排出。