Eggertsen S C
J Fam Pract. 1983 May;16(5):909-13.
Whether or not intermittent positive pressure breathing (IPPB) is beneficial in the treatment of asthma has been controversial for 30 years. IPPB is expensive and has been associated with pulmonary infection, pneumomediastinum, pneumothorax, and death. The exact factors involved in the observed effectiveness of IPPB remain undetermined. With evidence from a literature review, it is concluded that in cases of severe asthma failing to respond to other methods of beta-agonist inhalation, there is sufficient evidence for the use of IPPB.
间歇性正压通气(IPPB)对哮喘治疗是否有益,30年来一直存在争议。IPPB费用高昂,且与肺部感染、纵隔气肿、气胸及死亡相关。IPPB观察到的有效性的确切相关因素仍未明确。根据文献综述的证据得出结论,对于严重哮喘且对其他β受体激动剂吸入方法无反应的病例,有充分证据支持使用IPPB。