Kirkeby-Garstad I, Skogvoll E, Sellevold F M
Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, University Hospital of Trondheim, Norway.
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2000 Oct;44(9):1103-8. doi: 10.1034/j.1399-6576.2000.440912.x.
Oximetry catheters immediately reflect changes in mixed venous oxygen saturation (SvO2). We have used the Baxter 2-SAT system to register changes in SvO2 during early mobilizations after cardiac surgery. To assess catheter reliability, readings were compared to blood gases.
A total of 352 paired catheter and bench haemoximetry measurements were obtained at the expected highest and lowest levels of SvO2 during the mobilization procedures. The agreement between methods was explored by a Bland-Altman plot. The influence of haemoglobin (Hgb), pH, cardiac output (CO), posture, catheter identity and catheter calibration on agreement was assessed through analysis of covariance.
Data included a substantial number of low SvO2 values, 95 paired means of SvO2 < or = 50% and 37 paired means < or = 40%. Mean oxygen saturation difference between catheter and haemoximeter readings was -1.6 +/- 5.7% (SD). Agreement between the methods depended upon the level of SvO2. At SvO2 of 65%, the two methods were virtually identical. Below 65%, the catheters increasingly underestimated the corresponding haemoximetric values by 1.5% for every 10% reduction in SvO2. Agreement was to some degree dependent on individual calibrations and catheter identity, but to a lesser extent on Hgb, CO and posture.
The two methods are interchangeable for most clinical purposes. Catheter readings are, however, substantially lower than the corresponding haemoximetric measurements at low SvO2 values. Careful interpretation of the absolute values resulting from catheter measurements is recommended, especially when SvO2 readings are low.
血氧饱和度导管可立即反映混合静脉血氧饱和度(SvO2)的变化。我们使用百特2-SAT系统记录心脏手术后早期活动期间SvO2的变化。为评估导管的可靠性,将读数与血气分析结果进行了比较。
在活动过程中,于预计的SvO2最高和最低水平获取了352对导管测量值和台式血氧饱和度测量值。通过布兰德-奥特曼图探讨两种方法之间的一致性。通过协方差分析评估血红蛋白(Hgb)、pH值、心输出量(CO)、体位、导管标识和导管校准对一致性的影响。
数据包括大量低SvO2值,95对SvO2≤50%的均值和37对SvO2≤40%的均值。导管读数与血氧饱和度仪读数之间的平均氧饱和度差值为-1.6±5.7%(标准差)。两种方法之间的一致性取决于SvO2水平。当SvO2为65%时,两种方法几乎相同。低于65%时,随着SvO2每降低10%,导管对相应血氧饱和度仪测量值的低估程度增加1.5%。一致性在一定程度上取决于个体校准和导管标识,但在较小程度上取决于Hgb、CO和体位。
对于大多数临床目的,这两种方法可相互替代。然而,在低SvO2值时,导管读数显著低于相应的血氧饱和度仪测量值。建议仔细解读导管测量所得的绝对值,尤其是当SvO2读数较低时。