Suppr超能文献

组织工程皮肤(奥皮格拉夫)用于大疱性表皮松解症伤口患者的愈合。

Tissue-engineered skin (Apligraf) in the healing of patients with epidermolysis bullosa wounds.

作者信息

Falabella A F, Valencia I C, Eaglstein W H, Schachner L A

机构信息

VAMC Department of Dermatology, 1201 NW 16th St (165), Miami, FL 33125, USA.

出版信息

Arch Dermatol. 2000 Oct;136(10):1225-30. doi: 10.1001/archderm.136.10.1225.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

At present, wound treatment of inherited epidermolysis bullosa (EB) is only supportive.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the safety and clinical effects of tissue-engineered skin (Apligraf; Organogenesis Inc, Canton, Mass) in the healing of wounds of patients with different types of EB.

DESIGN

An open-label uncontrolled study of 15 patients with EB treated with tissue-engineered skin. Each patient received tissue-engineered skin on up to 2 wounds on each of 3 clinic visits: day 1, week 6, and week 12. They were evaluated 7 (+/- 3) days and 6 weeks after each round of treatment. A quality-of-life survey was administered during week 6.

SETTING

University of Miami, Miami, Fla.

PATIENTS

Volunteers with EB.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Safety and wound healing.

RESULTS

A total of 69 different acute wounds received tissue-engineered skin at the day-1 (24 wounds), week-6 (23 wounds), and week-12 (22 wounds) visits. Overall, 63 wounds (79%) were found healed at the day-7 visit. Of the acute wounds, 82% (51/62) were healed 6 weeks after being treated, 75% (27/36) after 12 weeks, and 79% (11/14) after 18 weeks. Nine chronic wounds were also treated. Four were healed at 6 weeks; however, 7 were still open at the last clinic visit (week 18). There were no signs of rejection or clinical infection and no adverse events related to the tissue-engineered skin. The quality of life for most patients improved after treatment. Compared with patients' recollection of wounds treated with standard dressings, healing was faster and less painful.

CONCLUSION

In this series of patients, tissue-engineered skin induced very rapid healing, was not clinically rejected, and was devoid of adverse effects. It was felt by the patients and families to be more effective than conventional dressings for EB wounds.

摘要

背景

目前,遗传性大疱性表皮松解症(EB)的伤口治疗仅为支持性治疗。

目的

确定组织工程皮肤(Apligraf;Organogenesis公司,马萨诸塞州坎顿)对不同类型EB患者伤口愈合的安全性和临床效果。

设计

一项对15例接受组织工程皮肤治疗的EB患者进行的开放标签非对照研究。每位患者在3次门诊就诊(第1天、第6周和第12周)时,在多达2处伤口上接受组织工程皮肤治疗。在每轮治疗后7(±3)天和6周对他们进行评估。在第6周进行了生活质量调查。

地点

佛罗里达州迈阿密市迈阿密大学。

患者

EB志愿者。

主要观察指标

安全性和伤口愈合情况。

结果

在第1天(24处伤口)、第6周(23处伤口)和第12周(22处伤口)的就诊中,共有69处不同的急性伤口接受了组织工程皮肤治疗。总体而言,在第7天的就诊中发现63处伤口(79%)愈合。在急性伤口中,82%(51/62)在治疗后6周愈合,75%(27/36)在12周后愈合,79%(11/14)在18周后愈合。还治疗了9处慢性伤口。4处伤口在6周时愈合;然而,在最后一次门诊就诊(第18周)时,仍有7处伤口未愈合。没有排斥或临床感染的迹象,也没有与组织工程皮肤相关的不良事件。大多数患者治疗后的生活质量有所改善。与患者回忆的用标准敷料治疗的伤口相比,愈合更快且疼痛减轻。

结论

在这一系列患者中,组织工程皮肤促进了非常快速的愈合,未出现临床排斥反应,且无不良反应。患者和家属认为它对EB伤口的治疗比传统敷料更有效。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验