Suppr超能文献

接受机械通气的新生儿的神经肌肉麻痹

Neuromuscular paralysis for newborn infants receiving mechanical ventilation.

作者信息

Cools F, Offringa M

机构信息

Pediatrics, Academic Hospital, Free University of Brussels, Laarbeeklaan 101, Brussels, Belgium, 1090.

出版信息

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000(4):CD002773. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002773.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Ventilated newborn infants breathing in asynchrony with the ventilator are at risk for complications during mechanical ventilation, such as pneumothorax or intraventricular hemorrhage, and are exposed to more severe barotrauma, which consequently could impair their clinical outcome. Neuromuscular paralysis, which eliminates spontaneous breathing efforts of the infant, has potential advantages in this respect. However, a number of complications have been reported with muscle relaxation in infants, so that concerns exist regarding the safety of prolonged neuromuscular paralysis in newborn infants.

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether routine neuromuscular paralysis of newborn infants receiving mechanical ventilation compared with no routine paralysis results in clinically important benefits or harms.

SEARCH STRATEGY

MEDLINE (from 1966 to May 2000) and EMBASE (from 1988 to May 2000) were searched, as well as The Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (issue 2, 2000). References of review articles were hand searched. Language restriction was not imposed.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All trials using random or quasi-random patient allocation, in which the routine use of neuromuscular blocking agents during mechanical ventilation was compared to no paralysis or selective paralysis in newborn infants. Methodological quality was assessed blindly and independently by the two authors.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Data were abstracted using standard methods of the Cochrane Collaboration and its Neonatal Review Group, with independent evaluation of trial quality, and abstraction and synthesis of data by both authors. Treatment effect was analysed using relative risk, risk difference and weighted mean difference.

MAIN RESULTS

Ten possibly eligible trials were identified, of which five were included in the review. All the included trials studied preterm infants ventilated for respiratory distress syndrome, and used pancuronium as the neuromuscular blocking agent. In the analysis of the results of all trials, no difference was found in mortality, air leak or chronic lung disease, but there was a significant reduction in intraventricular hemorrhage and a trend towards less severe intraventricular hemorrhages. In the subgroup analysis of trials studying a selected population of ventilated infants with evidence of asynchronous respiratory efforts, a significant reduction in intraventricular hemorrhage (any grade and severe IVH) was found, and a trend towards less air leak. In the subgroup analysis of trials studying an unselected population of ventilated infants, no differences were found for any of the outcomes.

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: For ventilated preterm infants with evidence of asynchronous respiratory efforts, neuromuscular paralysis with pancuronium seems to have a favourable effect on intraventricular hemorrhage and possibly on air leak. Uncertainty remains, however, regarding the long term pulmonary and neurologic effects, and regarding the safety of prolonged use of pancuronium in ventilated newborn infants. There is no evidence from randomized trials on the effects of neuromuscular blocking agents other than pancuronium. Therefore, the routine use of pancuronium or any other neuromuscular blocking agent in ventilated newborn infants cannot be recommended based on current evidence.

摘要

背景

接受机械通气的新生儿若呼吸与呼吸机不同步,在机械通气期间有发生并发症的风险,如气胸或脑室内出血,并且会遭受更严重的气压伤,这可能会影响其临床结局。消除婴儿自主呼吸努力的神经肌肉麻痹在这方面具有潜在优势。然而,已有报道称婴儿使用肌肉松弛剂会出现多种并发症,因此对于新生儿长期神经肌肉麻痹的安全性存在担忧。

目的

确定接受机械通气的新生儿常规使用神经肌肉麻痹与不进行常规麻痹相比,是否会带来具有临床意义的益处或危害。

检索策略

检索了MEDLINE(1966年至2000年5月)、EMBASE(1988年至2000年5月)以及Cochrane对照试验注册库(2000年第2期)。对综述文章的参考文献进行了手工检索。未设语言限制。

选择标准

所有采用随机或半随机患者分配的试验,其中将机械通气期间常规使用神经肌肉阻滞剂与新生儿不进行麻痹或选择性麻痹进行比较。两位作者独立且盲法评估方法学质量。

数据收集与分析

使用Cochrane协作网及其新生儿综述小组的标准方法提取数据,对试验质量进行独立评估,两位作者对数据进行提取和综合。采用相对风险、风险差值和加权均数差值分析治疗效果。

主要结果

共识别出10项可能符合条件的试验,其中5项纳入综述。所有纳入试验均研究因呼吸窘迫综合征接受通气的早产儿,并使用潘库溴铵作为神经肌肉阻滞剂。在对所有试验结果的分析中,未发现死亡率、气漏或慢性肺病方面存在差异,但脑室内出血显著减少,且有脑室内出血程度减轻的趋势。在对有呼吸不同步证据的选定通气婴儿群体进行的试验亚组分析中,发现脑室内出血(任何级别和重度脑室内出血)显著减少,且有气漏减少的趋势。在对未选定的通气婴儿群体进行的试验亚组分析中,所有结局均未发现差异。

综述作者结论

对于有呼吸不同步证据的通气早产儿,使用潘库溴铵进行神经肌肉麻痹似乎对脑室内出血以及可能对气漏有有利影响。然而,关于长期肺部和神经影响以及在通气新生儿中长时间使用潘库溴铵的安全性仍存在不确定性。除潘库溴铵外,尚无随机试验证明其他神经肌肉阻滞剂的效果。因此,基于目前证据,不建议在通气新生儿中常规使用潘库溴铵或任何其他神经肌肉阻滞剂。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验