• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于急性中风的血管活性药物。

Vasoactive drugs for acute stroke.

机构信息

Division of Stroke Medicine, University of Nottingham, City Hospital Campus, Hucknall Road, Nottingham, Nottinghamshire, UK, NG5 1PB.

出版信息

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000(4):CD002839. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002839.

DOI:10.1002/14651858.CD002839
PMID:11034772
Abstract

BACKGROUND

It is unclear whether blood pressure should be managed after acute stroke and if so whether it is best to reduce or increase blood pressure.

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this review was to assess the effect of lowering or elevating blood pressure in people with acute stroke, and the effect of different vasoactive drugs on blood pressure in acute stroke.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Library (1999 Issue 1) using the CDSR and the CCTR databases, MEDLINE (from 1966), EMBASE (from 1980), BIDS ISI (Science Citation Index from 1981), and existing review articles. We contacted researchers in the field and pharmaceutical companies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised trials of interventions that would be expected, on pharmacological grounds, to alter blood pressure in patients within two weeks of the onset of acute ischaemic or haemorrhagic stroke.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two reviewers independently applied the trial inclusion criteria, assessed trial quality, and extracted the data.

MAIN RESULTS

Sixty five trials were identified involving in excess of 11,500 patients; a further 5 trials are ongoing. Data were obtained for 32 trials (5,368 patients). Significant imbalances in baseline blood pressure were present across trials of intravenous calcium channel blockers and prostacyclin. Major imbalances in baseline blood pressure between treatment and control groups have made the interpretation of these results difficult. Intravenous calcium channel blockers (CCBs) and oral CCBs significantly lowered late blood pressure as compared to controls. (systolic/diastolic BP): iv CCBs -8.2/-6.7 mm Hg (95% CI -12.6 to -3.8)/ (95% CI -9.2 to -4.3); oral CCBs -3.2/-2.1 mm Hg (95% CI -5.0 to -1.3)/ (95% CI -3.0 to -1.0). Beta blockers significantly lowered late diastolic blood pressure but not significantly late systolic blood pressure; -5.0/-4.5 mm Hg (95% CI -10.2 to 0.4)/(95% CI -7.8 to -1.15). Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors and prostacyclin non-significantly reduced late BP as compared to the controls by -5.4/-3.0 mm Hg (95% CI -16.5 to 5.8)/(95% CI -11.1 to 5.0) and -7.4/-3.9 mmHg (95% CI -15.6 to 0.2)/(95% CI -8.1 to 0.4) respectively. Magnesium, naftidrofuryl and piracetam had no significant effect on blood pressure. Oral CCBs and beta blockers each significantly reduced late heart rate (beats per minute (bpm)): CCBs -2.8 bpm (95%CI -3.9 to -1.7); beta blockers -9.3 bpm (95% CI -12.0 to -6.6). Prostacyclin significantly increased late heart rate by +5.6 bpm (95% CI 0.8 to 10.4). None of the drug classes significantly altered outcome apart from beta blockers and streptokinase which increased early case fatality (odds ratio 1.77, 95%CI, 1.05 to 3.00) and 2.27 (95% CI 1.4 to 3.67).

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: There is not enough evidence reliably to evaluate the effect of altering blood pressure on outcome after acute stroke. CCBs, beta blockers, and probably ACE-inhibitors, prostacyclin and nitric oxide, each lowered BP during the acute phase of stroke. In contrast, magnesium, naftidrofuryl and piracetam had little or no effect on BP.

摘要

背景

急性卒中后是否应控制血压,若需控制,降低血压还是升高血压更佳尚不清楚。

目的

本综述旨在评估降低或升高急性卒中患者血压的效果,以及不同血管活性药物对急性卒中患者血压的影响。

检索策略

我们使用CDSR和CCTR数据库检索了Cochrane图书馆(1999年第1期)、MEDLINE(始于1966年)、EMBASE(始于1980年)、BIDS ISI(始于1981年的科学引文索引)以及现有综述文章。我们联系了该领域的研究人员和制药公司。

入选标准

基于药理学原理,预期能在急性缺血性或出血性卒中发病两周内改变患者血压的干预措施的随机试验。

数据收集与分析

两名综述作者独立应用试验纳入标准、评估试验质量并提取数据。

主要结果

共识别出65项试验,涉及超过11500名患者;另有5项试验正在进行。获取了32项试验(5368名患者)的数据。静脉注射钙通道阻滞剂和前列环素的试验中,基线血压存在显著失衡。治疗组和对照组之间基线血压的重大失衡使得这些结果的解读变得困难。与对照组相比,静脉注射钙通道阻滞剂(CCB)和口服CCB显著降低了后期血压。(收缩压/舒张压):静脉注射CCB -8.2/-6.7 mmHg(95%CI -12.6至-3.8)/(95%CI -9.2至-4.3);口服CCB -3.2/-2.1 mmHg(95%CI -5.0至-1.3)/(95%CI -3.0至-1.0)。β受体阻滞剂显著降低了后期舒张压,但未显著降低后期收缩压;-5.0/-4.5 mmHg(95%CI -10.2至0.4)/(95%CI -7.8至-1.15)。与对照组相比,血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂和前列环素对后期血压的降低不显著,分别为-5.4/-3.0 mmHg(95%CI -16.5至5.8)/(95%CI -11.1至5.0)和-7.4/-3.9 mmHg(95%CI -15.6至0.2)/(95%CI -8.1至0.4)。镁、萘呋胺和吡拉西坦对血压无显著影响。口服CCB和β受体阻滞剂均显著降低了后期心率(每分钟心跳数(bpm)):CCB -2.8 bpm(95%CI -3.9至-1.7);β受体阻滞剂 -9.3 bpm(95%CI -12.0至-6.6)。前列环素显著增加后期心率,增加了+5.6 bpm(95%CI 0.8至10.4)。除β受体阻滞剂和链激酶增加早期病死率(比值比1.77,95%CI,1.05至3.00)和2.27(95%CI 1.4至3.67)外,没有一类药物能显著改变结局。

综述作者结论

没有足够的证据可靠地评估改变血压对急性卒中后结局的影响。CCB、β受体阻滞剂,可能还有血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂、前列环素和一氧化氮,均在卒中急性期降低了血压。相比之下,镁、萘呋胺和吡拉西坦对血压几乎没有影响。

相似文献

1
Vasoactive drugs for acute stroke.用于急性中风的血管活性药物。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000(4):CD002839. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002839.
2
Interventions for deliberately altering blood pressure in acute stroke.急性卒中时故意改变血压的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2001(3):CD000039. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000039.
3
Beta-blockers for hypertension.用于治疗高血压的β受体阻滞剂。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Jan 24(1):CD002003. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002003.pub2.
4
First-line drugs for hypertension.高血压一线用药。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Apr 18;4(4):CD001841. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001841.pub3.
5
Oral beta-blockers for mild to moderate hypertension during pregnancy.孕期轻至中度高血压的口服β受体阻滞剂治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000;2003(4):CD002863. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002863.
6
Thrombolysis for acute ischaemic stroke.急性缺血性脑卒中的溶栓治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003(3):CD000213. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000213.
7
Interventions for deliberately altering blood pressure in acute stroke.急性卒中时刻意改变血压的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000(2):CD000039. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000039.
8
Calcium channel blockers versus other classes of drugs for hypertension.钙通道阻滞剂与其他降压药物的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Oct 17;10(10):CD003654. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003654.pub5.
9
Calcium channel blockers versus other classes of drugs for hypertension.钙通道阻滞剂与其他类药物治疗高血压的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jan 9;1(1):CD003654. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003654.pub6.
10
Systemic treatments for metastatic cutaneous melanoma.转移性皮肤黑色素瘤的全身治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Feb 6;2(2):CD011123. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011123.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Cerebrolysin for acute ischaemic stroke.脑活素治疗急性缺血性中风
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Apr 21;4(4):CD007026. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007026.pub5.
2
Cerebrolysin for acute ischaemic stroke.脑蛋白水解物用于急性缺血性卒中
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Dec 5;12(12):CD007026. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007026.pub4.
3
Control of blood pressure in hypertensive neurological emergencies.高血压性神经急症的血压控制。
Curr Hypertens Rep. 2014 Jun;16(6):436. doi: 10.1007/s11906-014-0436-x.
4
Elevated blood pressure in the acute phase of stroke and the role of Angiotensin receptor blockers.中风急性期的血压升高与血管紧张素受体阻滞剂的作用
Int J Hypertens. 2013;2013:941783. doi: 10.1155/2013/941783. Epub 2013 Jan 31.
5
Treatment of hypertension in acute ischemic stroke.急性缺血性脑卒中的高血压治疗。
Curr Treat Options Neurol. 2009 Mar;11(2):120-5. doi: 10.1007/s11940-009-0015-7.
6
New insights into hypertension management in acute stroke: let the CHHIPS fall where they may.急性卒中高血压管理的新见解:让CHHIPS顺其自然。
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2008 Jun;10(6):425-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-7176.2008.08086.x.
7
Management of arterial hypertension in patients with acute stroke.急性脑卒中患者的动脉高血压管理。
Curr Treat Options Neurol. 2006 Nov;8(6):477-85. doi: 10.1007/s11940-006-0037-3.
8
What do we (not) know about the management of blood pressure in acute stroke?关于急性卒中患者血压管理我们(不)知道些什么?
Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2004 Nov;4(6):505-9. doi: 10.1007/s11910-004-0076-7.