Anderson P, Kitchin R
Family Planning Association, Belfast, Northern Ireland, UK.
Soc Sci Med. 2000 Oct;51(8):1163-73. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(00)00019-8.
In this paper we examine, from a social perspective, access to family planning clinics for disabled people. We argue that disabled people are commonly understood to be either asexual, uninterested in sex or unable to take part in sexual activity, or sexual 'monsters' unable to control their sexual drives and feelings. These understandings are reproduced through the use of cultural representations and myths, and are evidenced in the planning and design of family planning clinics and the information and services they provide. To illustrate our arguments we present the findings of a short questionnaire survey of all family planning clinics in Northern Ireland. Physical access to these clinics was partial, and access to information and services were extremely limited. These results indicate that disabled people are not expected to be using the services (consultation, treatment, information) that family planning clinics provide. As such, family planning clinics in Northern Ireland represent a landscape of exclusion, denying disabled people access to services and reproducing cultural ideologies concerning disability and sexuality.
在本文中,我们从社会视角审视残疾人获取计划生育诊所服务的情况。我们认为,人们通常认为残疾人要么无性取向、对性不感兴趣或无法参与性活动,要么是无法控制性冲动和情感的性“怪物”。这些认知通过文化表征和神话得以再现,并在计划生育诊所的规划与设计以及它们所提供的信息和服务中得到体现。为说明我们的观点,我们展示了对北爱尔兰所有计划生育诊所进行的简短问卷调查结果。残疾人对这些诊所的实际可达性有限,获取信息和服务的机会也极为受限。这些结果表明,人们并不期望残疾人使用计划生育诊所提供的服务(咨询、治疗、信息)。因此,北爱尔兰的计划生育诊所呈现出一种排斥的局面,拒绝为残疾人提供服务,并再现了有关残疾与性取向的文化观念。