• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[Duplicate publication a way of embellishing research results. Unethical misuse which threatens the validity of systematic reviews and meta-analysis].

作者信息

Eliasson M

机构信息

Sunderby sjukhus, Luleå.

出版信息

Lakartidningen. 2000 Aug 9;97(32-33):3454-6.

PMID:11037585
Abstract

Studies showing favourable results tend to be published more than once. This practice of duplicate publication is, however, dishonest and unethical on the part of scientists and pharmaceutical companies. Inclusion into a meta-analysis of the results from multiple papers derived from one and the same controlled study gives an inflated picture of the efficacy of the treatment. If manufacturers and researchers not only made all their study data public but also registered trials prospectively these pitfalls could be avoided.

摘要

相似文献

1
[Duplicate publication a way of embellishing research results. Unethical misuse which threatens the validity of systematic reviews and meta-analysis].
Lakartidningen. 2000 Aug 9;97(32-33):3454-6.
2
Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.基于证据的医学、系统评价以及介入性疼痛管理指南:第6部分。观察性研究的系统评价与荟萃分析
Pain Physician. 2009 Sep-Oct;12(5):819-50.
3
[Clinical decision-making: systematic reviews and meta-analysis].[临床决策:系统评价与荟萃分析]
Neurologia. 2003 Mar;18(2):70-3.
4
The need for trial identifiers.试验标识符的必要性。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2004;20(2):203-6. doi: 10.1185/030079903125002883.
5
Review articles and publication bias.综述文章与发表偏倚。
Arzneimittelforschung. 1992 May;42(5):587-91.
6
Primer: strengths and weaknesses of meta-analysis.综述:荟萃分析的优点与不足
Nat Clin Pract Rheumatol. 2008 Mar;4(3):146-52. doi: 10.1038/ncprheum0732.
7
[Research results should be freely accessible!-- Case reports demonstrate obstacles to contact with drug industry].[研究成果应免费获取!——病例报告显示与制药行业接触存在障碍]
Lakartidningen. 2001 Sep 12;98(37):3913-6.
8
Methodologic issues in systematic reviews and meta-analyses.系统评价与荟萃分析中的方法学问题。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003 Aug(413):43-54. doi: 10.1097/01.blo.0000079322.41006.5b.
9
Deconstructing evidence in orthodontics: making sense of systematic reviews, randomized clinical trials, and meta-analyses.解析正畸学中的证据:理解系统评价、随机临床试验和荟萃分析。
World J Orthod. 2008 Summer;9(2):167-76.
10
How to read and understand and use systematic reviews and meta-analyses.如何阅读、理解和使用系统评价与Meta分析。
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2009 Jun;119(6):443-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.2009.01388.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Outcomes of HIV treatment from the private sector in low-income and middle-income countries: a systematic review protocol.中低收入国家私营部门治疗艾滋病的结果:系统评价方案。
BMJ Open. 2020 Jan 8;10(1):e031844. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031844.