Suppr超能文献

低危分化型甲状腺癌患者的全甲状腺切除术或甲状腺叶切除术:使用数学模型对一个争议问题的手术决策分析

Total thyroidectomy or thyroid lobectomy in patients with low-risk differentiated thyroid cancer: surgical decision analysis of a controversy using a mathematical model.

作者信息

Kebebew E, Duh Q Y, Clark O H

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, School of Medicine, UCSF/Mount Zion Medical Center, 1600 Divisadero Street, San Francisco, California 94120, USA.

出版信息

World J Surg. 2000 Nov;24(11):1295-302. doi: 10.1007/s002680010215.

Abstract

There is a general consensus that total or near-total thyroidectomy is the optimal treatment for patients with high risk differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC), but the optimal extent of thyroidectomy in patients with low risk DTC continues to be controversial. To determine the optimal extent of thyroidectomy in patients with low risk DTC, we used decision analysis to compare the trade-offs of total thyroidectomy (TT) to thyroid lobectomy (TL). The decision analysis model included the probabilities of thyroidectomy complications, risk of DTC recurrence, and death from DTC. This information was obtained from the literature and from outcome data for patients with low risk DTC from our institution. In addition, the concept of utilities was used in the analysis. To determine the utility of each health outcome state (thyroidectomy complication, DTC recurrence, and DTC mortality for low risk patients) a survey was conducted. Overall, prospective patients viewed DTC recurrence as less desirable than thyroidectomy complication. The utilities assigned by the survey participants varied over a wide range, with 61.5% of the individuals viewing the occurrence of a thyroidectomy complication as better than DTC recurrence. At baseline utilities and probabilities, TT had a higher expected utility than TL. One-way sensitivity analysis varying the rates of (1) thyroidectomy complication, (2) DTC recurrence, and (3) DTC mortality over the possible range showed that complication from initial thyroidectomy was the most important factor that determined the preferred extent of thyroidectomy. TL was the preferred surgical approach only if a complication rate of > 33:1, TT/TL complication rate ratio, was assumed. When no differences in DTC recurrence between the two approaches was assumed in the model, TL had a higher expected utility using the baseline utilities of thyroidectomy complication and DTC mortality. The analysis indicates that TT in patients with low risk DTC is preferable to TL. However, TL is preferred if (1) no difference in the DTC recurrence rate between the two approaches is assumed, (2) a higher complication rate for TT is used (> 33 times higher), or (3) the utility ratio of thyroidectomy complication to DTC recurrence is < 0.8 TL. We believe this decision analysis model provides an objective approach that others can use to select the optimal extent of thyroidectomy based on patient preference of health outcome states, institution-specific outcome data for DTC recurrence or mortality, and the surgeon-specific complication rate.

摘要

对于高风险分化型甲状腺癌(DTC)患者,全甲状腺切除或近全甲状腺切除是最佳治疗方法,这已达成普遍共识,但低风险DTC患者甲状腺切除的最佳范围仍存在争议。为了确定低风险DTC患者甲状腺切除的最佳范围,我们采用决策分析来比较全甲状腺切除术(TT)与甲状腺叶切除术(TL)的权衡。决策分析模型包括甲状腺切除并发症的概率、DTC复发风险和DTC死亡风险。这些信息来自文献以及我们机构低风险DTC患者的结局数据。此外,分析中还使用了效用概念。为了确定每种健康结局状态(甲状腺切除并发症、DTC复发以及低风险患者的DTC死亡率)的效用,我们进行了一项调查。总体而言,前瞻性患者认为DTC复发不如甲状腺切除并发症可取。调查参与者赋予的效用差异很大,61.5%的个体认为发生甲状腺切除并发症比DTC复发更好。在基线效用和概率时,TT的预期效用高于TL。对(1)甲状腺切除并发症发生率、(2)DTC复发率和(3)DTC死亡率在可能范围内进行单因素敏感性分析表明,初次甲状腺切除的并发症是决定甲状腺切除首选范围的最重要因素。仅当假设TT/TL并发症发生率比>33:1时,TL才是首选的手术方法。当模型中假设两种方法的DTC复发无差异时,使用甲状腺切除并发症和DTC死亡率的基线效用,TL具有更高的预期效用。分析表明,低风险DTC患者行TT优于TL。然而,如果(1)假设两种方法的DTC复发率无差异,(2)使用TT更高的并发症发生率(>33倍),或(3)甲状腺切除并发症与DTC复发的效用比<0.8 TL,则TL更可取。我们认为这种决策分析模型提供了一种客观方法,其他人可以根据患者对健康结局状态的偏好、机构特定的DTC复发或死亡率结局数据以及外科医生特定的并发症发生率来选择甲状腺切除的最佳范围。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验