Segal M
Department of Neurobiology, The Weizmann Institute, 76100, Rehovot, Israel.
Prog Neurobiol. 2001 Jan;63(1):61-70. doi: 10.1016/s0301-0082(00)00021-6.
Contrary to a century-old belief that dendritic spines are stable storage sites of long term memory, the emerging picture from a recent flurry of exciting observations using novel high resolution imaging methods of living cells in culture is that of a dynamic structure, which undergoes fast morphological changes over periods of hours and even minutes. Concurrently, the nature of stimuli which cause formation or collapse of dendritic spines has changed from a mysterious Hebbian-governed plasticity producing stimulus to the more trivial activation of the synapse by strong/weak stimulation. The molecular mechanisms underlying spine plasticity are beginning to emerge; the role of presynaptic and/or postsynaptic activity, genetic, central or local factors in the formation and retraction of spines are currently being analyzed. A common mechanism for both, formation/elongation and pruning/retraction of spines, involving changes in intracellular calcium concentration (Ca(2+)), is emerging. It appears that Ca(2+) is related to changes in spines in a bell shape form: lack of synaptic activity causes transient outgrowth of filopodia but eventual elimination of spines, a moderate rise in Ca(2+) causes elongation of existing spines and formation of new ones, while a massive increase in Ca(2+) such as that seen in seizure activity, causes fast shrinkage and eventual collapse of spines. Nuclear signals (e.g. CREB), activated by an increase in Ca(2+), are involved in the central regulation of spine formation, while spine shrinkage and elongation are probably triggered by local Ca(2+) changes. This hypothesis provides a parsimonious explanation for conflicting reports on activity-dependent changes in dendritic spine morphology. Still, the many differences between cultured neurons, with which most of current studies are conducted, and the neuron in the real brain, require a cautious extrapolation of current assumptions on the regulation of spine formation.
与一个世纪以来认为树突棘是长期记忆稳定存储位点的观点相反,近期一系列使用新型高分辨率成像方法对培养中的活细胞进行的令人兴奋的观察结果所呈现出的画面是,树突棘是一种动态结构,它在数小时甚至数分钟内会经历快速的形态变化。与此同时,导致树突棘形成或消失的刺激性质已从神秘的遵循赫布法则的可塑性产生刺激转变为通过强/弱刺激对突触进行更普通的激活。树突棘可塑性背后的分子机制正开始显现;目前正在分析突触前和/或突触后活动、基因、中枢或局部因素在树突棘形成和回缩中的作用。一种涉及细胞内钙浓度(Ca(2+))变化的树突棘形成/伸长和修剪/回缩的共同机制正在浮现。似乎Ca(2+)与树突棘变化呈钟形关系:缺乏突触活动会导致丝状伪足短暂生长,但最终树突棘会消失,Ca(2+)适度升高会导致现有树突棘伸长并形成新的树突棘,而Ca(2+)大幅增加(如在癫痫活动中所见)会导致树突棘快速收缩并最终消失。由Ca(2+)增加激活的核信号(如CREB)参与树突棘形成的中枢调节,而树突棘的收缩和伸长可能由局部Ca(2+)变化触发。这一假设为关于树突棘形态依赖活动变化的相互矛盾的报告提供了一个简洁的解释。尽管如此,目前大多数研究是在培养神经元上进行的,而培养神经元与真实大脑中的神经元存在诸多差异,这就需要谨慎推断当前关于树突棘形成调节的假设。