Smith S L
Department of Sociology and Anthropology, University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, Texas 76019, USA.
Am J Phys Anthropol. 2000 Nov;113(3):329-48. doi: 10.1002/1096-8644(200011)113:3<329::AID-AJPA5>3.0.CO;2-B.
Human distal pollical phalanx form has been associated with tool manufacture, and the broad tuft of this bone in Neanderthals has been suggested to be a climatic adaptation and/or an aid to a tremendously powerful grip. A wide first metacarpal head has also been proposed to be useful in distinguishing tool-dependent hominids from those less reliant on tools. In order to contribute to an evaluation of these hypotheses variation in first metacarpal and distal phalanx shape is explored among samples of modern humans and compared to that of fossil hominids. Modern humans are from the Terry Collection, Larsen Bay, a Chinese-Alaskan cemetery, Egypt, and Sully and Mobridge. Hominid fossils include AL 333w-39, SKX 5016, SK 84, Stw 294, OH 7, several Neanderthals, Skhūl 4 and 5, and Predmostí 3. Analysis involves length-width ratios, regressions of distal phalanx tuft width on base width and of metacarpal head width on length, and pattern profiles based on Z-scores with reference to the Larsen Bay sample. Larsen Bay individuals are robust, while Terry "blacks," Egyptians, and Chinese-Alaskan males tend to be gracile. Fossil hominids are most distinctive for distal phalanx radioulnar tuft and mid-shaft widths relative to length. Security of grip is one plausible explanation. While most modern samples are positively allometric for tuft width relative to base width, the Larsen Bay and fossil hominid samples are not; thus caution is advised in accepting a base-tuft width comparison as a tool-dependence marker. Separation from modern humans is not easily achieved with metacarpal measures, but the Hadar metacarpal has distinctively narrow radioulnar head width ratios. While first metacarpal head expansion among hominids may plausibly be related to tool manufacture, other activities that place stress on the metacarpophalangeal joint should also be considered.
人类拇指远节指骨的形态与工具制造有关,有人认为尼安德特人这块骨头的宽阔指端是一种气候适应性特征和/或有助于实现极其有力的抓握。还有人提出,宽阔的第一掌骨头有助于区分依赖工具的原始人类和那些对工具依赖程度较低的原始人类。为了有助于评估这些假设,我们研究了现代人类样本中第一掌骨和远节指骨形状的变异情况,并与化石原始人类的情况进行了比较。现代人类样本来自特里收藏、拉森湾(一个中国 - 阿拉斯加墓地)、埃及以及萨利和莫布里奇。原始人类化石包括AL 333w - 39、SKX 5016、SK 84、Stw 294、OH 7、几个尼安德特人、斯胡尔4号和5号以及普雷德莫斯蒂3号。分析包括长宽比、远节指骨指端宽度相对于基部宽度的回归以及掌骨头宽度相对于长度的回归,还有基于相对于拉森湾样本的Z分数的模式轮廓分析。拉森湾的个体骨骼粗壮,而特里的“黑人”、埃及人和中国 - 阿拉斯加男性往往较为纤细。化石原始人类在远节指骨桡尺侧指端和骨干中部宽度相对于长度方面最为独特。抓握的稳定性是一种合理的解释。虽然大多数现代样本的指端宽度相对于基部宽度呈正异速生长,但拉森湾和化石原始人类样本并非如此;因此,在将基部 - 指端宽度比较作为工具依赖标志时应谨慎。用掌骨测量方法不容易将化石原始人类与现代人类区分开来,但哈达尔掌骨的桡尺侧头部宽度比明显较窄。虽然原始人类中第一掌骨头的增大可能与工具制造合理相关,但也应考虑其他对手掌指关节施加压力的活动。