Ricci S, Antonuzzo A, Galli L, Tibaldi C, Bertuccelli M, Lopes Pegna A, Petruzzelli S, Bonifazi V, Orlandini C, Franco Conte P
U.O. Oncologia Medica, Ospedale S. Chiara Hospital, Pisa, Italy.
Cancer. 2000 Oct 15;89(8):1714-9. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(20001015)89:8<1714::aid-cncr10>3.0.co;2-7.
This randomized trial was designed to investigate the feasibility, toxicity, and activity of two different schedules of gemcitabine plus cisplatin in previously untreated patients with advanced (International Union Against Cancer (UICC) Stage IIIB-IV) nonsmall cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC).
From February 1997 to September 1998, 82 patients with advanced NSCLC were entered onto the study and were randomized to gemcitabine 1000 mg/m(2) on Days 1, 8, and 15 plus cisplatin 80 mg/m(2) on Day 2 (arm A) or Day 15 (arm B) every 28 days.
All the patients were assessable for toxicity (arm A/arm B: 151/177 cycles; median, 4 of 5 cycles per patient), and the following Grade 3-4 toxicities were reported (percentage of cycles in arm A vs. arm B): anemia, 7.9% and 2.3% (P < 0.05); leukopenia, 6.0% and 6.7%; thrombocytopenia, 15.0% and 1.6% (P < 0.01); no World Health Organization (WHO) Grade 3-4 nonhematologic toxicities were observed. These side effects led to gemcitabine dose reductions in 35.1% of courses in arm A and 22.0% of courses in arm B (P < 0.05) and to gemcitabine omissions in 28.5% of courses in arm A versus 7.3% of courses in arm B (P < 0.01). Dose intensities (DIs) of gemcitabine were 607.5 mg/m(2)/week in arm A and 711.6 mg/m(2)/week in arm B (P < 0.01); DIs of cisplatin were 18. 1 mg/m(2)/week in arm A and 18.8 mg/m(2)/week in arm B. The total delivered doses of gemcitabine were 9315.5 mg/m(2) in arm A and 12, 631.0 mg/m(2) in arm B (P < 0.01); the total delivered doses of cisplatin were 277.1 mg/m(2) in arm A and 333.0 mg/m(2) in arm B (P < 0.01). Response rates according to intention to treat were 40.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 25.5-55.3) in arm A and 45% (95% CI, 29.5-60.5) in arm B. The overall median duration of response was 7.4 months; the median time to disease progression was 6 months (95% CI, 3-9) in arm A and 9 months (95% CI, 4-14) in arm B (P < 0.02); the median overall survival was 10 months (95% CI, 7.0-12.5) in arm A and 17 months (95% CI, 13.0-21.6) in arm B (P < 0.01); the 1-year survival rates were 34% and 63%, respectively.
Our data show that arm B (cisplatin on Day 15) is less toxic than arm A (cisplatin on Day 2) and allows the administration of significantly higher total doses and dose intensities of chemotherapy. No significant differences in response rates were observed between the two schedules; patients on arm B experienced a significantly more prolonged progression free and overall survival; however, the study was not powered to detect differences in these outcomes.
本随机试验旨在研究吉西他滨联合顺铂两种不同给药方案在既往未接受治疗的晚期(国际抗癌联盟(UICC)IIIB - IV期)非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者中的可行性、毒性及活性。
1997年2月至1998年9月,82例晚期NSCLC患者进入本研究,并随机分为两组,A组为第1、8、15天给予吉西他滨1000 mg/m²,第2天给予顺铂80 mg/m²;B组为第1、8、15天给予吉西他滨1000 mg/m²,第15天给予顺铂80 mg/m²,每28天为一个周期。
所有患者均可评估毒性(A组/ B组:151/177个周期;中位数,每位患者5个周期中的4个),报告的3 - 4级毒性如下(A组与B组周期百分比):贫血,7.9%和2.3%(P < 0.05);白细胞减少,6.0%和6.7%;血小板减少,15.0%和1.6%(P < 0.01);未观察到世界卫生组织(WHO)3 - 4级非血液学毒性。这些副作用导致A组35.1%的疗程和B组22.0%的疗程吉西他滨剂量减少(P < 0.05),A组28.5%的疗程和B组7.3%的疗程吉西他滨停药(P < 0.01)。A组吉西他滨的剂量强度(DI)为607.5 mg/m²/周,B组为711.6 mg/m²/周(P < 0.01);A组顺铂的DI为18.1 mg/m²/周与B组为18.8 mg/m²/周。A组吉西他滨的总给药剂量为9315.5 mg/m²,B组为12631.0 mg/m²(P < 0.01);A组顺铂的总给药剂量为277.1 mg/m²,B组为333.0 mg/m²(P < 0.01)。根据意向性分析,A组的缓解率为40.4%(95%置信区间[CI],25.5 - 55.3),B组为45%(95% CI,29.5 - 60.5)。总体缓解持续时间的中位数为7.4个月;A组疾病进展的中位时间为6个月(95% CI,3 - 9),B组为9个月(95% CI,4 - 14)(P < 0.02);A组的中位总生存期为10个月(95% CI,7.0 - 12.5),B组为17个月(95% CI,13.0 - 21.6)(P < 0.01);1年生存率分别为34%和63%。
我们的数据表明,B组(第15天给予顺铂)的毒性低于A组(第2天给予顺铂),且允许给予显著更高的化疗总剂量和剂量强度。两种给药方案的缓解率无显著差异;B组患者的无进展生存期和总生存期显著延长;然而,本研究的检验效能不足以检测这些结果的差异。