• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[心理能力与知情同意。临床实践与伦理分析]

[Mental competence and informed consent. Clinical practice and ethical analysis].

作者信息

Vollmann J

机构信息

Institut für Geschichte der Medizin, FU Berlin.

出版信息

Nervenarzt. 2000 Sep;71(9):709-14. doi: 10.1007/s001150050654.

DOI:10.1007/s001150050654
PMID:11042865
Abstract

The doctrine of informed consent has become a legal and ethical standard in psychiatry today. However, ethical problems arise if patients lose the capacity to give informed consent due to their psychiatric disorders. Particularly in the field of psychiatry, the assessment of competence of informed consent to medical treatment and participation in clinical trials is a controversial issue. New empirical data suggest that a high percentage of psychiatric patients are incompetent according to defined standards for assessing their capacity to make treatment decisions. Assessing competence according to a sliding scale integrates the ethical principles of autonomy and beneficence and provides help in assessing competence in clinical practice.

摘要

如今,知情同意原则已成为精神病学领域的一项法律和伦理标准。然而,如果患者因精神疾病而丧失了给予知情同意的能力,就会出现伦理问题。特别是在精神病学领域,对医疗治疗和参与临床试验的知情同意能力的评估是一个有争议的问题。新的实证数据表明,根据评估治疗决策能力的既定标准,很大比例的精神病患者无行为能力。根据滑动量表评估行为能力,整合了自主性和有益性的伦理原则,并为临床实践中的行为能力评估提供了帮助。

相似文献

1
[Mental competence and informed consent. Clinical practice and ethical analysis].[心理能力与知情同意。临床实践与伦理分析]
Nervenarzt. 2000 Sep;71(9):709-14. doi: 10.1007/s001150050654.
2
Informed consent in psychiatric research - concepts and challenges.精神科研究中的知情同意——概念与挑战
Psychiatr Danub. 2014 Sep;26(3):271-6.
3
Complexity of ethical decision making in psychiatry.精神病学中伦理决策的复杂性。
Ethics Behav. 1997;7(1):1-14. doi: 10.1207/s15327019eb0701_1.
4
The ethical basis of psychiatric research: conceptual issues and empirical findings.精神病学研究的伦理基础:概念问题与实证发现。
Compr Psychiatry. 1998 May-Jun;39(3):99-110. doi: 10.1016/s0010-440x(98)90068-2.
5
[Informed consent and patient competence in the psychically ill. A review of empirical studies].[精神病患者的知情同意与患者行为能力。实证研究综述]
Nervenarzt. 2002 Nov;73(11):1031-8. doi: 10.1007/s00115-002-1297-0.
6
[Informed consent in psychiatry--European standards and differences, problems and recommendations].[精神病学中的知情同意——欧洲标准及差异、问题与建议]
Fortschr Neurol Psychiatr. 1997 Jan;65(1):23-33. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-996306.
7
Autonomy and beneficence: ethical issues in electroconvulsive therapy.自主性与行善原则:电休克治疗中的伦理问题
Convuls Ther. 1992 Dec;8(4):237-44.
8
Ethical challenges in the conduct of research involving persons with mental retardation.涉及智力迟钝者的研究行为中的伦理挑战。
Ment Retard. 2001 Apr;39(2):130-41. doi: 10.1352/0047-6765(2001)039<0130:ECITCO>2.0.CO;2.
9
American Psychiatric Association resources document on principles of informed consent in psychiatry.美国精神病学协会关于精神病学中知情同意原则的资源文件。
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 1997;25(1):121-5.
10
Research guidelines issued for persons with mental disorders and impaired capacity to make decisions.针对精神障碍患者及决策能力受损者发布了研究指南。
Psychiatr Serv. 1999 Jan;50(1):128-9. doi: 10.1176/ps.50.1.128.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessment of decisional capacity. A systematic review and analysis of instruments regarding their applicability to requests for assisted suicide.决策能力评估。关于其在协助自杀请求中的适用性的工具的系统评价与分析。
Eur Psychiatry. 2025 Jul 8;68(1):e91. doi: 10.1192/j.eurpsy.2025.10041.
2
[Compulsory treatment in psychiatry: an ethical analysis of the new legal regulations for clinical practice].[精神病学中的强制治疗:对临床实践新法律法规的伦理分析]
Nervenarzt. 2014 May;85(5):614-20. doi: 10.1007/s00115-013-3866-9.
3
[Neuroethics--a future discipline?].
[神经伦理学——一门未来的学科?]
Nervenarzt. 2006 Jan;77(1):5-11. doi: 10.1007/s00115-005-1895-8.
4
The cognitive based approach of capacity assessment in psychiatry: a philosophical critique of the MacCAT-T.精神病学中基于认知的能力评估方法:对MacCAT-T的哲学批判
Health Care Anal. 2004 Dec;12(4):273-83; discussion 265-72. doi: 10.1007/s10728-004-6635-x.