Suppr超能文献

用低钾溶液进行逆行冲洗灌注以改善实验性肺保存。

Retrograde flush perfusion with low-potassium solutions for improvement of experimental pulmonary preservation.

作者信息

Wittwer T, Fehrenbach A, Meyer D, Brandes H, Albes J, Richter J, Wahlers T

机构信息

Department of Cardiac Surgery, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, Friedrich-Schiller University, Jena, Germany.

出版信息

J Heart Lung Transplant. 2000 Oct;19(10):976-83. doi: 10.1016/s1053-2498(00)00189-3.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Optimal preservation of post-ischemic organ function is a continuing challenge in clinical lung transplantation. Retrograde instillation of preservation solutions has the theoretic advantage of achieving homogeneous distribution in the lung because of perfusing both the pulmonary and the bronchial circulation. So far, we have seen no experimental studies that include stereologic analysis of intrapulmonary edema concerning the influence of retrograde preservation on post-ischemic lung function after preservation with Perfadex and Celsior.

METHODS

In an extracorporeal rat model, we perfused 8 lungs, each, using either antegrade or retrograde perfusion technique with Celsior (CE(ant)/CE(ret)) and Perfadex (PER(ant)/PER(ret)). Results were compared with low-potassium Euro-Collins. Post-ischemic lungs were reventilated and reperfused mechanically. We continuously monitored relative oxygenation capacity (ROC), pulmonary artery pressure, flush time, and wet/dry ratio. Furthermore, we used stereologic means to evaluate edema formation. Statistics comprised different analysis of variance models.

RESULTS

Relative oxygen capacity of CE(ant)-protected lungs was superior to that of PER(ant) preservation (p = 0.05). Use of PER(ret) resulted in significantly higher ROC as compared with PER(ant) (p < 0.001) and was comparable to results obtained with CE-preservation, which was not further improved with retrograde application.

CONCLUSIONS

Celsior provides better lung preservation than does Perfadex when administered antegradely. Retrograde application of Perfadex results in significant functional improvement as compared with antegrade perfusion, which reaches the standard of Celsior-protected organs. Additional in vivo experiments in combination with ultrastructural analysis are warranted to further evaluate retrograde delivery of preservation solutions, which could be used in clinical lung transplantation to further optimize current results.

摘要

背景

在临床肺移植中,如何最佳地保存缺血后器官功能仍是一项持续面临的挑战。由于保存液既能灌注肺循环又能灌注支气管循环,逆行灌注保存液在肺内实现均匀分布方面具有理论优势。到目前为止,我们尚未见到有关在使用Perfadex和Celsior保存后,逆行保存对缺血后肺功能影响的肺内水肿的体视学分析的实验研究。

方法

在大鼠体外模型中,我们使用Celsior(CE(ant)/CE(ret))和Perfadex(PER(ant)/PER(ret))分别通过顺行或逆行灌注技术对8个肺进行灌注。将结果与低钾Euro-Collins进行比较。对缺血后的肺进行机械性再通气和再灌注。我们持续监测相对氧合能力(ROC)、肺动脉压、冲洗时间和湿/干比。此外,我们使用体视学方法评估水肿形成情况。统计学分析采用不同的方差分析模型。

结果

CE(ant)保存的肺的相对氧合能力优于PER(ant)保存(p = 0.05)。与PER(ant)相比,PER(ret)的使用导致显著更高的ROC(p < 0.001),并且与CE保存获得的结果相当,逆行应用并未进一步改善。

结论

顺行给药时,Celsior比Perfadex能更好地保存肺。与顺行灌注相比,Perfadex逆行应用可导致显著的功能改善,达到Celsior保护器官的标准。有必要进行额外的体内实验并结合超微结构分析,以进一步评估保存液的逆行输送,这可用于临床肺移植以进一步优化当前结果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验