Perreault S, Levinton C, Le Lorier J
University of Montreal, Montreal, Canada.
Can J Clin Pharmacol. 2000 Autumn;7(3):144-54.
Screening for hyperlipidemia is a substantial cost burden, as is its treatment. The choice of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitors (statins) and the dose level may have significant implications for both efficient and cost effective therapy.
To compare the efficiency and cost of statins.
A meta-analysis was conducted of randomized, controlled trials of monotherapy with fixed doses of statins published in the literature until June 1998. Two authors independently extracted data from 49 trials comprising 14,130 patients. The percentage reduction (95% confidence intervals) of low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels was calculated using a random-effects model. Cost efficiency was defined as the percentage decline of LDL cholesterol per dollar of drug cost.
The population evaluated had a mean baseline LDL cholesterol concentration of 5.31 mmol/L, a mean age of 53.5 years and a mean 59% proportion of males. In reducing LDL cholesterol concentrations to less than 25% of the baseline concentration, a significantly higher cost efficiency was achieved with simvastatin 2.5 mg (-53.3%/dollar). By targeting a reduction between 25% and 29%, significantly higher cost efficiencies were found with simvastatin 5 mg (-28.9%/dollar), cerivastatin 0.2 mg (-23.8%/dollar) and fluvastatin 40 mg (-23.3%/dollar). For reductions in LDL cholesterol concentrations of 30% to 34%, statistically higher cost efficiencies were achieved with simvastatin 20 mg (-15.0%/dollar) and pravastatin 40 mg (-14. 4%/dollar). Finally, atorvastatin 10 mg yielded a value of -22. 9%/dollar for a 36% reduction in LDL cholesterol concentration.
At current prices of the various doses of statins, the cost efficiency of standard and more aggressive therapies varies substantially. In the context of health care budgets, targeting at-risk patients and using statins judiciously should facilitate the efforts of clinicians and patients to reduce lipid profiles optimally and decrease the cost burden.
高脂血症筛查是一项巨大的成本负担,其治疗亦是如此。3-羟基-3-甲基戊二酰辅酶A还原酶抑制剂(他汀类药物)的选择及剂量水平可能对有效且具成本效益的治疗产生重大影响。
比较他汀类药物的疗效和成本。
对1998年6月前发表的关于固定剂量他汀类药物单药治疗的随机对照试验进行荟萃分析。两位作者独立从49项试验中提取数据,这些试验涵盖14130名患者。使用随机效应模型计算低密度脂蛋白(LDL)胆固醇水平的降低百分比(95%置信区间)。成本效益定义为每美元药物成本导致的LDL胆固醇下降百分比。
评估人群的平均基线LDL胆固醇浓度为5.31 mmol/L,平均年龄为53.5岁,男性平均比例为59%。在将LDL胆固醇浓度降至低于基线浓度的25%时,辛伐他汀2.5毫克具有显著更高的成本效益(-53.3%/美元)。若目标是降低25%至29%,辛伐他汀5毫克(-28.9%/美元)、西立伐他汀0.2毫克(-23.8%/美元)和氟伐他汀40毫克(-23.3%/美元)具有显著更高的成本效益。对于LDL胆固醇浓度降低30%至34%,辛伐他汀20毫克(-15.0%/美元)和普伐他汀40毫克(-14.4%/美元)在统计学上具有更高的成本效益。最后,阿托伐他汀10毫克在LDL胆固醇浓度降低36%时的成本效益值为-22.9%/美元。
按照目前各种剂量他汀类药物的价格,标准治疗和更积极治疗的成本效益差异很大。在医疗保健预算的背景下,针对高危患者并明智地使用他汀类药物应有助于临床医生和患者努力优化降低血脂水平并减轻成本负担。