Rossmann J A, Israel M
Department of Periodontics, Baylor College of Dentistry, Texas A&M University System Health Science Center at Dallas, USA.
Dent Clin North Am. 2000 Oct;44(4):793-809.
The rationale for laser de-epithelialization stems from the attempts to block the down-growth of epithelium into the healing periodontal wound after surgery and prevent formation of a long junctional epithelial attachment. This concept has seen numerous techniques for accomplishing the blockage of epithelium. The advent of GTR was an offshoot of this concept and led Gottlow et al [table: see text] to examine the effects of selectively blocking certain cell types from contacting the root surface during periodontal wound healing. The use of a CO2 laser to de-epithelialize the gingival flaps is an attempt to exclude this cell type from the healing wound and has been used with and without the benefit of GTR membranes. In a study on beagle dogs, the histologic results of using membranes and the laser procedure enhanced the wound healing and regeneration of new bone, cementum, and connective tissue attachment when compared with paired defects using the membranes alone. The results from the human studies and case reports combined with the animal studies indicate a positive benefit in wound healing because of the laser de-epithelialization technique. The use of an osseous graft in treatment of periodontal defects has been shown to stimulate new bone growth effectively and to regenerate new attachment. It has been speculated that the additional benefit of an osseous graft in GTR procedures is the organization of the blood clot at initial healing, which may tend to maintain the space needed for regeneration and to provide a matrix for the fibrin clot to retard epithelial down-growth. Studies comparing the results of osseous grafting with flap debridement always have shown that the amount of new bone formation and clinical new attachment favor the grafted sites versus paired nongrafted sites. The effects of removal of the pocket epithelium at the time of periodontal surgery have been studied by several authors, and these studies generally shown an incomplete removal of the sulcular epithelium by the inverse bevel incision. Epithelial excision was studied by Centty et al, who compared the removal of sulcular epithelium by the CO2 laser technique with conventional methods. Their results confirm that (1) a more complete removal of sulcular epithelium was obtained by laser than by knives, and (2) the technique effectively removes the oral and sulcular epithelium from a gingival flap without damaging the viability of the flap during wound healing. The technique as described in this article was used by Israel et al to verify further the ability to maintain a viable gingival flap during multiple laser deepithelialization procedures in humans during the first 30 days of healing. [table: see text] The concept of laser de-epithelialization as an adjunct to regenerative periodontal procedures currently is being studied in a multicenter university setting using a parallel study in controlled clinical trials. The first of these reports was mentioned previously (Araujo et al, unpublished data) and shows the enhanced wound healing of periodontal defects through use of the laser de-epithelialization technique. The authors believe that this technique has shown significantly better results than those obtained through conventional osseous grafting alone and appears to be comparable to the results reported for GTR procedures with barrier membranes. This concept provides a paradigm shift from the conventional use of GTR therapy by acknowledging the difficulty in controlling epithelium during the early wound healing. It also allows a more comprehensive therapy for treating periodontal disease that addresses the generalized nature of the disease, with multiple lesions being treated concurrently in an economical manner. The patient presenting with generalized advanced periodontal disease could have several defects definitively treated in one quadrant using the laser deepithelialization technique without the need for multiple membrane therapy. (ABSTRACT TRUNCATE
激光去上皮的理论依据源于人们试图在手术后阻止上皮向下生长进入愈合中的牙周伤口,并防止形成长结合上皮附着。这一概念催生了众多实现上皮阻塞的技术。引导组织再生术(GTR)的出现就是这一概念的衍生物,它促使哥特洛等人[见表:见正文]去研究在牙周伤口愈合过程中选择性阻止某些细胞类型与根面接触的效果。使用二氧化碳激光对牙龈瓣进行去上皮处理,就是试图将这种细胞类型排除在愈合伤口之外,并且这种方法在使用或不使用GTR膜的情况下都有应用。在一项针对比格犬的研究中,与仅使用膜的配对缺损相比,使用膜和激光程序的组织学结果显示,伤口愈合以及新骨、牙骨质和结缔组织附着的再生情况更好。人体研究和病例报告的结果与动物研究相结合,表明激光去上皮技术对伤口愈合有积极作用。已证明使用骨移植治疗牙周缺损能有效刺激新骨生长并实现新附着的再生。据推测,骨移植在GTR程序中的额外益处在于,在初始愈合阶段能使血凝块有序化,这可能有助于维持再生所需的空间,并为纤维蛋白凝块提供一个基质以延缓上皮向下生长。比较骨移植与翻瓣清创术结果的研究始终表明,新骨形成量和临床新附着情况在移植部位优于配对的未移植部位。几位作者研究了牙周手术时去除袋上皮的效果,这些研究总体表明反斜切口对龈沟上皮的去除并不完全。森蒂等人研究了上皮切除情况,他们将二氧化碳激光技术去除龈沟上皮的效果与传统方法进行了比较。他们的结果证实:(1)激光比手术刀能更彻底地去除龈沟上皮;(2)该技术能有效从牙龈瓣上去除口腔和龈沟上皮,且在伤口愈合过程中不会损害瓣的活力。以色列等人采用本文所述技术,进一步验证了在人类愈合的前30天内多次进行激光去上皮程序时维持牙龈瓣存活的能力。[见表:见正文]目前,在多中心大学环境中,正在通过对照临床试验中的平行研究,对激光去上皮作为再生性牙周程序辅助手段的概念进行研究。这些报告中的第一篇前文已提及(阿劳霍等人,未发表数据),显示通过使用激光去上皮技术,牙周缺损的伤口愈合得到了改善。作者认为,该技术的效果明显优于单独使用传统骨移植的效果,并且似乎与使用屏障膜的GTR程序报告的结果相当。这一概念通过承认早期伤口愈合过程中控制上皮的困难,实现了从传统GTR疗法的转变。它还为治疗牙周病提供了一种更全面的疗法,该疗法考虑到疾病具有普遍性,能够以经济的方式同时治疗多个病损。患有广泛性重度牙周病的患者,使用激光去上皮技术可以在一个象限内对多个缺损进行确定性治疗,而无需进行多次膜治疗。(摘要截断)