Penneys N S
Department of Dermatology, Saint Louis University Health Sciences Center, Missouri, USA.
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2000 Nov;43(5 Pt 1):809-13. doi: 10.1067/mjd.2000.107761.
There is significant demand for dermatologic care, and manpower is limited. Increasing patient encounters stress office processes. Analyses of the effects of schedule manipulation in a high-volume dermatology office have not been described.
The purpose of this article is to study the effects of block versus sequential scheduling on patient waiting times, length of patient encounters, and physician patient-free time in two busy dermatology clinics.
A dermatologist attended at two dermatology clinics, one using sequential patient scheduling and the other, block hourly scheduling. Time of patient arrival, scheduled appointment time, waiting time, time of physician entry into the examining room, face-to-face time with the physician, appointment type, number of same-day cancellations and nonattendance by visit type, length of each clinic, time of clinic closure, and patient-free time were recorded for each clinic and patient encounter.
There were no significant differences between patient waiting times at the two clinics. Patients were seen by the physician a mean of 2.6 minutes before their scheduled appointment time using block scheduling of appointments and 6 minutes after their scheduled appointment times with sequential scheduling. Similar times were spent by the physician with the patients at both sites. After adjustment for differing nonattendance rates, block scheduling yielded 330 minutes of additional patient-free time during the course of this study when compared with sequential scheduling. With block scheduling, the clinic finished a mean of 35 minutes earlier than clinics using sequential scheduling.
Within the parameters of this study, block scheduling did not significantly affect patient waiting times. Block scheduling created more patient-free time for the physician and clinical staff than did sequential scheduling. Block scheduling increased the quality of the practice environment from the perspective of the physician and the staff.
皮肤科护理的需求巨大,但人力有限。患者就诊量的增加给门诊流程带来了压力。目前尚未有关于大容量皮肤科门诊日程安排调整效果的分析报道。
本文旨在研究在两家繁忙的皮肤科诊所中,时段预约与顺序预约对患者候诊时间、患者就诊时长以及医生无患者时间的影响。
一名皮肤科医生在两家皮肤科诊所坐诊,一家采用患者顺序预约,另一家采用每小时时段预约。记录每家诊所及每次患者就诊的患者到达时间、预约时间、候诊时间、医生进入检查室的时间、与医生面对面的时间、预约类型、当日取消预约的数量以及按就诊类型统计的未就诊情况、每家诊所的时长、诊所关门时间和医生无患者时间。
两家诊所的患者候诊时间无显著差异。采用时段预约时,患者平均在预约时间前2.6分钟见到医生;采用顺序预约时,患者平均在预约时间后6分钟见到医生。在两个地点,医生与患者相处的时间相近。在对不同的未就诊率进行调整后,与顺序预约相比,在本研究过程中时段预约为医生多提供了330分钟的无患者时间。采用时段预约时,诊所平均比采用顺序预约的诊所提前35分钟结束。
在本研究的参数范围内,时段预约对患者候诊时间没有显著影响。与顺序预约相比,时段预约为医生和临床工作人员创造了更多的无患者时间。从医生和工作人员的角度来看,时段预约提高了门诊环境的质量。