• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

阿尔茨海默病中HUI2和HUI3效用评分的比较。

A comparison of HUI2 and HUI3 utility scores in Alzheimer's disease.

作者信息

Neumann P J, Sandberg E A, Araki S S, Kuntz K M, Feeny D, Weinstein M C

机构信息

Program on the Economic Evaluation of Medical Technology, Center for Risk Analysis, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA.

出版信息

Med Decis Making. 2000 Oct-Dec;20(4):413-22. doi: 10.1177/0272989X0002000405.

DOI:10.1177/0272989X0002000405
PMID:11059474
Abstract

PURPOSE

The Health Utilities Index (HUI) is a generic, multiattribute, preference-based health-status classification system. The HUI Mark 3 (HUI3) differs from the earlier HUI2 by modifying attributes and allowing more flexibility for capturing high levels of impairment. The authors compared HUI2 and HUI3 scores of patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD) and caregivers, and contrasted results of a cost-effectiveness analysis of new drugs for AD using the two systems.

METHODS

In a cross-sectional study of 679 AD patient/caregiver pairs, stratified by patient's disease stage (questionable/mild/moderate/severe/profound/terminal) and setting (community/assisted living/nursing home), caregivers completed the combined HUI2/HUI3 questionnaire as proxy respondents for patients and for themselves.

RESULTS

Mean (SD) global utility scores for patients were lower on the HUI3 (0.22[0.26]) than on the HUI2 (0.53 [0.21]). Patient HUI3 utility scores ranged from 0.47(0.24) for questionable AD to -0.23 (0.08) for terminal AD, compared with a range of 0.73 (0.15) to 0.14 (0.07) for the HUI2. Among the 203 patients in the severe, profound, and terminal stages, 96 (48%) had negative global HUI3 utility scores, while none had a negative HUI2 score. The utility scores for caregivers were similar on the HUI3 (0.87 [0.14]) and HUI2 (0.87 [0.11]). Cost-effectiveness analysis of a new medication to treat AD showed somewhat more favorable results using the HUI3.

CONCLUSIONS

The HUI2 and HUI3 discriminate well across AD stages. Compared with the HUI2, the HUI3 yields lower global utility scores for patients with AD, and more scores for states judged worse than dead. The HUI3 may yield substantially different results from the HUI2, particularly for persons who have serious cognitive impairments such as AD.

摘要

目的

健康效用指数(HUI)是一种通用的、多属性的、基于偏好的健康状况分类系统。HUI Mark 3(HUI3)与早期的HUI2不同,它修改了属性,并在捕捉高水平损伤方面具有更大的灵活性。作者比较了阿尔茨海默病(AD)患者及其照料者的HUI2和HUI3得分,并对比了使用这两种系统对AD新药进行成本效益分析的结果。

方法

在一项对679对AD患者/照料者的横断面研究中,根据患者的疾病阶段(可疑/轻度/中度/重度/极重度/终末期)和环境(社区/辅助生活/疗养院)进行分层,照料者作为患者及其自身的代理应答者完成HUI2/HUI3联合问卷。

结果

患者的平均(标准差)总体效用得分在HUI3上(0.22[0.26])低于HUI2(0.53[0.21])。患者的HUI3效用得分范围从可疑AD的0.47(0.24)到终末期AD的-0.23(0.08),而HUI2的范围是0.73(0.15)到0.14(0.07)。在重度、极重度和终末期的203名患者中,96名(48%)的总体HUI3效用得分为负,而HUI2得分均无负分。照料者的效用得分在HUI3(0.87[0.14])和HUI2(0.87[0.11])上相似。一种治疗AD的新药的成本效益分析显示,使用HUI3时结果略更有利。

结论

HUI2和HUI3在AD各阶段的区分效果良好。与HUI2相比,HUI3使AD患者的总体效用得分更低,且对于比死亡更差状态的得分更多。HUI3可能产生与HUI2显著不同的结果,特别是对于患有严重认知障碍如AD的人。

相似文献

1
A comparison of HUI2 and HUI3 utility scores in Alzheimer's disease.阿尔茨海默病中HUI2和HUI3效用评分的比较。
Med Decis Making. 2000 Oct-Dec;20(4):413-22. doi: 10.1177/0272989X0002000405.
2
Health utilities in Alzheimer's disease: a cross-sectional study of patients and caregivers.阿尔茨海默病的健康效用:一项针对患者及其照料者的横断面研究
Med Care. 1999 Jan;37(1):27-32. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199901000-00005.
3
Responsiveness and construct validity of the health utilities index in patients with dementia.痴呆患者健康效用指数的反应性和结构效度
Med Care. 2009 Jun;47(6):651-61. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e31819241b9.
4
Quality of Life and Utility Measurement in a Large Clinical Trial Sample of Patients with Mild to Moderate Alzheimer's Disease: Determinants and Level of Changes Observed.轻度至中度阿尔茨海默病患者大型临床试验样本中的生活质量与效用测量:观察到的决定因素及变化水平
Value Health. 2015 Jul;18(5):638-45. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2015.03.1787. Epub 2015 Apr 10.
5
Comparing directly measured standard gamble scores to HUI2 and HUI3 utility scores: group- and individual-level comparisons.将直接测量的标准博弈分数与健康效用指数2(HUI2)和健康效用指数3(HUI3)效用分数进行比较:组水平和个体水平比较。
Soc Sci Med. 2004 Feb;58(4):799-809. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(03)00254-5.
6
A comparison of the health utilities indices Mark 2 and Mark 3 in type 2 diabetes.2型糖尿病中健康效用指数Mark 2与Mark 3的比较。
Med Decis Making. 2003 Nov-Dec;23(6):489-501. doi: 10.1177/0272989X03258438.
7
Caregivers' assessments of preference-based quality of life in Alzheimer's disease.照顾者对阿尔茨海默病基于偏好的生活质量的评估。
Alzheimers Dement. 2008 May;4(3):203-11. doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2007.11.018. Epub 2008 Apr 24.
8
Economic evaluation of donepezil in moderate to severe Alzheimer disease.多奈哌齐治疗中重度阿尔茨海默病的经济学评价
Neurology. 2004 Aug 24;63(4):644-50. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000134663.79663.6e.
9
Preference-based quality of life in patients with Alzheimer's disease.阿尔茨海默病患者基于偏好的生活质量
Alzheimers Dement. 2008 May;4(3):193-202. doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2007.11.019. Epub 2008 May 2.
10
Cost-effectiveness analysis of donepezil for mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease in Taiwan.多奈哌齐治疗台湾轻度至中度阿尔茨海默病的成本效益分析。
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2008 Jan;23(1):73-8. doi: 10.1002/gps.1842.

引用本文的文献

1
Cost-effectiveness analysis of aducanumab versus placebo for patients with mild cognitive impairment and mild Alzheimer's disease.阿杜卡单抗与安慰剂治疗轻度认知障碍和轻度阿尔茨海默病患者的成本效益分析。
BMJ Open. 2025 Apr 17;15(4):e090403. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-090403.
2
Assessment of disease impact through health-related quality of life measurement in primary progressive aphasia.通过测量原发性进行性失语症患者与健康相关的生活质量来评估疾病影响。
Alzheimers Dement (N Y). 2024 Nov 26;10(4):e12499. doi: 10.1002/trc2.12499. eCollection 2024 Oct-Dec.
3
Model-Based Economic Evaluations of Interventions for Dementia: An Updated Systematic Review and Quality Assessment.
基于模型的痴呆干预措施经济学评价:一项更新的系统评价和质量评估。
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2024 Jul;22(4):503-525. doi: 10.1007/s40258-024-00878-0. Epub 2024 Mar 30.
4
Disparities in health utilities among hepatitis C patients receiving care in different settings.在不同环境中接受治疗的丙型肝炎患者的健康效用差异。
Can Liver J. 2023 Feb 28;6(1):24-38. doi: 10.3138/canlivj-2022-0009. eCollection 2023 Feb.
5
Cost-effectiveness of Aducanumab and Donanemab for Early Alzheimer Disease in the US.Aducanumab 和 Donanemab 在治疗美国早期阿尔茨海默病的成本效益比较。
JAMA Neurol. 2022 May 1;79(5):478-487. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2022.0315.
6
Projecting the long-term societal value of a disease-modifying treatment for Alzheimer's disease in the United States.预测美国阿尔茨海默病疾病修正治疗的长期社会效益。
Alzheimers Dement. 2022 Jan;18(1):142-151. doi: 10.1002/alz.12578. Epub 2022 Feb 9.
7
The Quick Physical Activity Rating (QPAR) scale: A brief assessment of physical activity in older adults with and without cognitive impairment.快速体力活动评估(QPAR)量表:对认知障碍和非认知障碍老年人体力活动的简要评估。
PLoS One. 2020 Oct 30;15(10):e0241641. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0241641. eCollection 2020.
8
Epilepsy, impaired functioning, and quality of life in patients with tuberous sclerosis complex.结节性硬化症患者的癫痫、功能障碍及生活质量
Epilepsia Open. 2019 Oct 27;4(4):581-592. doi: 10.1002/epi4.12365. eCollection 2019 Dec.
9
Spillover Effects on Caregivers' and Family Members' Utility: A Systematic Review of the Literature.对照顾者和家庭成员效用的溢出效应:文献系统评价。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2019 Apr;37(4):475-499. doi: 10.1007/s40273-019-00768-7.
10
Alzheimer's disease Archimedes condition-event simulator: Development and validation.阿尔茨海默病阿基米德条件-事件模拟器:开发与验证。
Alzheimers Dement (N Y). 2018 Feb 16;4:76-88. doi: 10.1016/j.trci.2018.01.001. eCollection 2018.