Bellack A S, Haas G L, Schooler N R, Flory J D
VA Capitol Network, Mental Illness Research, Education, and Clinical Center (MIRECC) and University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Br J Psychiatry. 2000 Nov;177:434-9. doi: 10.1192/bjp.177.5.434.
Family interventions for schizophrenia have proved to be highly effective in preventing relapse, but it is not clear how they work or how they should be structured.
To examine the effects of a behavioural family intervention and a family support programme on communication, problem solving and outcome in order to determine the impact of structured communication training.
Patients and family members participating in the Treatment Strategies in Schizophrenia study were videotaped engaging in 10-minute problem-solving conversations at baseline and after the conclusion of the family intervention. Tapes were subsequently evaluated for changes in communication patterns.
The intensive behavioural intervention did not produce differential improvement in communication, and change in communication was unrelated to patient outcomes.
The data suggest that intensive behavioural family interventions may not be cost efficient, and that change in family communication patterns may only be important for a subset of families.
事实证明,针对精神分裂症的家庭干预在预防复发方面非常有效,但尚不清楚其作用方式以及应如何构建。
研究行为家庭干预和家庭支持计划对沟通、问题解决及结果的影响,以确定结构化沟通训练的作用。
参与精神分裂症治疗策略研究的患者及其家庭成员在基线时和家庭干预结束后,就解决问题进行了10分钟的对话,并进行了录像。随后对录像带进行评估,以观察沟通模式的变化。
强化行为干预在沟通方面并未产生差异改善,且沟通变化与患者结果无关。
数据表明,强化行为家庭干预可能不具有成本效益,且家庭沟通模式的变化可能仅对一部分家庭重要。