Suppr超能文献

剂量强化BEACOPP化疗用于晚期霍奇金淋巴瘤的急性血液学毒性及实用性。德国霍奇金淋巴瘤研究组(GHSG)。

Acute hematologic toxicity and practicability of dose-intensified BEACOPP chemotherapy for advanced stage Hodgkin's disease. German Hodgkin's Lymphoma Study Group (GHSG).

作者信息

Engel C, Loeffler M, Schmitz S, Tesch H, Diehl V

机构信息

Institute for Medical Informatics, Statistics and Epidemiology, University of Leipzig, Germany.

出版信息

Ann Oncol. 2000 Sep;11(9):1105-14. doi: 10.1023/a:1008301225839.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Evidence is recently accumulating that the novel BEACOPP (bleomycin (B), etoposide (E), adriamycin (A), cyclophosphamide (C), vincristine (O), procarbazine (P), prednisone (P)) chemotherapy is a highly effective treatment for advanced stage Hodgkin's disease. Two dose variants of BEACOPP are currently tested in a phase III randomized multicenter trial of the GHSG. To enable more extensive testing of BEACOPP we characterized its practicability regarding schedule adherence, acute hematotoxicity and need for supportive treatment.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Data of 858 patients (6592 therapy cycles) from 184 participating institutions were evaluated. Planned total drug doses of the baseline variant (arm 1) were 80, 2400, 200, 5200, 11.2, 5600 and 4480 mg/m2 for B, E, A, C, O, P and P, respectively. Compared to arm 1, the doses of E, A and C in the dose-intensified variant (arm 2) were escalated by factor 2.0, 1.4, 1.92, respectively, using G-CSF assistance. Stepwise dose reductions were specified in case of dose-limiting toxicities. Both variants are given in eight three-weekly courses.

RESULTS

Median dose adherence (dose actually given relative to planned arm 1 dose) in arm 1 was 1.0 for all drugs. Relative dose escalation of E, A, and C actually maintained in arm 2 was 1.83, 1.37 and 1.77 (medians), respectively, and 70% of patients maintained elevated dose levels throughout the entire treatment. Dose-limiting toxicities occurred in 25% of cycles in arm 2, most frequently due to leukocytopenia and thrombocytopenia. Time courses of leukocytes in arm 2 showed more severe but not more prolonged leukocytopenia compared with arm 1. WHO grades 3-4 infections were documented in 2.1% (arm 1) and 3.1% (arm 2) of all cycles. Erythrocytes were transfused in 61% (arm 1) and 28% (arm 2), platelets in < 1% (arm 1) and 6% (arm 2) of all cycles.

CONCLUSIONS

Both BEACOPP schemes are practicable in a large multicenter setting. Despite increased hematotoxicity, moderate dose escalation is safe for the majority of the patients with G-CSF assistance and standard supportive treatment.

摘要

背景

最近有越来越多的证据表明,新型BEACOPP(博来霉素(B)、依托泊苷(E)、阿霉素(A)、环磷酰胺(C)、长春新碱(O)、丙卡巴肼(P)、泼尼松(P))化疗是晚期霍奇金病的一种高效治疗方法。BEACOPP的两种剂量变体目前正在德国霍奇金淋巴瘤研究组(GHSG)的一项III期随机多中心试验中进行测试。为了能对BEACOPP进行更广泛的测试,我们对其在方案依从性、急性血液毒性和支持治疗需求方面的实用性进行了描述。

患者和方法

对来自184个参与机构的858例患者(6592个治疗周期)的数据进行了评估。基线变体(第1组)的计划总药物剂量,博来霉素、依托泊苷、阿霉素、环磷酰胺、长春新碱、丙卡巴肼和泼尼松分别为80、2400、200、5200、11.2、5600和(4480mg/m^2)。与第1组相比,剂量强化变体(第2组)中依托泊苷、阿霉素和环磷酰胺的剂量分别提高了2.0倍、1.4倍和1.92倍,并使用粒细胞集落刺激因子(G-CSF)辅助。如出现剂量限制性毒性,则规定逐步减少剂量。两种变体均每三周给药一次,共八个疗程。

结果

第1组中所有药物的中位剂量依从性(实际给予的剂量相对于计划的第1组剂量)均为1.0。第2组中实际维持的依托泊苷、阿霉素和环磷酰胺的相对剂量增加分别为1.83、1.37和1.77(中位数),70%的患者在整个治疗过程中维持较高的剂量水平。第2组中25%的周期出现剂量限制性毒性,最常见的原因是白细胞减少和血小板减少。与第1组相比,第2组白细胞的时间进程显示白细胞减少更严重,但持续时间并不更长。所有周期中,世界卫生组织3-4级感染在第1组中有2.1%,在第2组中有3.1%。所有周期中,第1组有61%的患者输注红细胞,第2组为28%;第1组输注血小板的患者<1%,第2组为6%。

结论

两种BEACOPP方案在大型多中心环境中都是可行的。尽管血液毒性增加,但在G-CSF辅助和标准支持治疗下,适度的剂量增加对大多数患者是安全的。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验