• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

初次治疗失败后输尿管结石重复冲击波碎石术的成功率较低。

Low success rate of repeat shock wave lithotripsy for ureteral stones after failed initial treatment.

作者信息

Pace K T, Weir M J, Tariq N, Honey R J

机构信息

Division of Urology, Saint Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

J Urol. 2000 Dec;164(6):1905-7.

PMID:11061877
Abstract

PURPOSE

We determined the number of shock wave lithotripsy treatments that should be given for a single ureteral stone before alternate modalities are used.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We compared the stone-free rate of initial shock wave lithotripsy for ureteral calculi with that of subsequent treatments. We evaluated 1,593 ureteral stones treated with the Dornier MFL 5000 lithotriptor* from January 1, 1994 to September 1, 1999 using various parameters associated with treatment outcome.

RESULTS

The stone-free rate after initial treatment was 68% (1,086 of 1,593 stones), which decreased to 46% (126 of 273) after re-treatment 1. We observed a further decrease in the stone-free rate after re-treatment 2 to 31% (19 of 61 stones, p = 0.001). The cumulative stone-free rate increased to 76% (1,212 of 1,593 stones) after 2 treatments and to 77% (1,231 of 1593) after 3. The stone-free rate for stones 10 mm. or less was significantly better than that of stones 11 to 20 mm. initially (64% versus 43%) and after re-treatment (49% versus 37%). A ureteral stent decreased the stone-free rate of initial treatment and re-treatment 1 by 12% and 14%, respectively (p = 0.001). After initial treatment the stone-free rate of the upper and mid ureter was significantly higher than that of the lower ureter. Patient weight had no significant impact on success in either group.

CONCLUSIONS

The stone-free rate of re-treating ureteral calculi with shock wave lithotripsy decreases significantly after the initial treatment. These findings imply that ureteroscopic management of ureteral stones may be better than shock wave lithotripsy after initial shock wave lithotripsy fails.

摘要

目的

我们确定了在采用其他治疗方式之前,单次输尿管结石应接受的冲击波碎石治疗次数。

材料与方法

我们比较了输尿管结石初次冲击波碎石与后续治疗的结石清除率。我们评估了1994年1月1日至1999年9月1日期间使用多尼尔MFL 5000碎石机*治疗的1593例输尿管结石,采用了与治疗结果相关的各种参数。

结果

初次治疗后的结石清除率为68%(1593例结石中的1086例),再次治疗1次后降至46%(273例中的126例)。我们观察到再次治疗2次后结石清除率进一步降至31%(61例中的19例,p = 0.001)。2次治疗后累积结石清除率增至76%(1593例结石中的1212例),3次治疗后增至77%(1593例中的1231例)。10毫米及以下结石的结石清除率在初始时(64%对43%)和再次治疗后(49%对37%)明显优于11至20毫米的结石。输尿管支架使初次治疗和再次治疗1次的结石清除率分别降低了12%和14%(p = 0.001)。初次治疗后,输尿管上段和中段的结石清除率明显高于下段。患者体重对两组的成功率均无显著影响。

结论

输尿管结石初次冲击波碎石治疗后,再次用冲击波碎石的结石清除率显著降低。这些发现表明,在初次冲击波碎石失败后,输尿管镜治疗输尿管结石可能优于冲击波碎石。

相似文献

1
Low success rate of repeat shock wave lithotripsy for ureteral stones after failed initial treatment.初次治疗失败后输尿管结石重复冲击波碎石术的成功率较低。
J Urol. 2000 Dec;164(6):1905-7.
2
Prognostic factors for extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy of ureteric stones--a multivariate analysis study.输尿管结石体外冲击波碎石术的预后因素——一项多变量分析研究
Scand J Urol Nephrol. 2003;37(5):413-8. doi: 10.1080/00365590310006255.
3
Does degree of hydronephrosis affect success of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for distal ureteral stones?肾积水程度会影响体外冲击波碎石术治疗输尿管下段结石的成功率吗?
Urology. 2007 Mar;69(3):431-5. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2006.11.010.
4
Variation in clinical outcome following shock wave lithotripsy.冲击波碎石术后临床结果的差异。
J Urol. 2000 Mar;163(3):721-5.
5
Is pre-shock wave lithotripsy stenting necessary for ureteral stones with moderate or severe hydronephrosis?对于伴有中度或重度肾积水的输尿管结石,冲击波碎石术前是否需要置入支架?
J Urol. 2006 Nov;176(5):2059-62; discussion 2062. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2006.07.022.
6
[Shock wave lithotripsy for ureteral stones--single institute experience in 661 consecutive cases].[冲击波碎石术治疗输尿管结石——单机构661例连续病例经验]
Harefuah. 2005 Sep;144(9):605-8, 680, 679.
7
A randomized outcomes trial of ureteral stents for extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy of solitary kidney or proximal ureteral stones.输尿管支架用于孤立肾或近端输尿管结石体外冲击波碎石术的随机结果试验。
J Urol. 2002 May;167(5):1981-3.
8
Outpatient basis extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for ureter stones: efficacy of the third generation lithotripter as the first line treatment.门诊体外冲击波碎石术治疗输尿管结石:第三代碎石机作为一线治疗的疗效
Int J Urol. 2008 Mar;15(3):210-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2042.2007.01970.x.
9
Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for distal ureteral calculi: what a powerful machine can achieve.体外冲击波碎石术治疗输尿管下段结石:一台强大的机器所能取得的成效。
J Urol. 2003 Mar;169(3):878-80. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000051896.15091.0c.
10
Efficiency and cost of treating proximal ureteral stones: shock wave lithotripsy versus ureteroscopy plus holmium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser.治疗近端输尿管结石的效率与成本:冲击波碎石术与输尿管镜检查联合钬:钇铝石榴石激光治疗的比较
Urology. 2004 Dec;64(6):1102-6; discussion 1106. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2004.07.040.

引用本文的文献

1
Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: retrospective study on possible predictors of treatment success and revisiting the role of non-contrast-enhanced computer tomography in kidney and ureteral stone disease.体外冲击波碎石术:治疗成功的可能预测因素的回顾性研究及重新探讨非增强计算机断层扫描在肾结石和输尿管结石病中的作用。
Urolithiasis. 2024 Apr 17;52(1):65. doi: 10.1007/s00240-024-01570-7.
2
Semirigid Flexible Ureteroscopy in the Management of Ureteral Stones - Review.半刚性与柔性输尿管镜在输尿管结石治疗中的应用——综述
Maedica (Bucur). 2023 Sep;18(3):490-497. doi: 10.26574/maedica.2023.18.3.490.
3
Virtual reality for pain control during shock wave lithotripsy: a randomized controlled study.
冲击波碎石术期间使用虚拟现实控制疼痛:一项随机对照研究。
World J Urol. 2023 Feb;41(2):589-594. doi: 10.1007/s00345-023-04280-8. Epub 2023 Jan 21.
4
The Efficiency of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy (ESWL) in the Treatment of Distal Ureteral Stones: An Unjustly Forgotten Option?体外冲击波碎石术(ESWL)治疗输尿管下段结石的疗效:一个被不公正遗忘的选择?
Cureus. 2022 Sep 1;14(9):e28671. doi: 10.7759/cureus.28671. eCollection 2022 Sep.
5
Shock Wave Lithotripsy Outcomes for Upper and Lower Ureteral Stones in Non-obese and Non-Pre-stented Adults: Is One Session Sufficient?非肥胖且未预先放置支架的成年人上下段输尿管结石的冲击波碎石术结果:单次治疗是否足够?
Cureus. 2022 Sep 26;14(9):e29592. doi: 10.7759/cureus.29592. eCollection 2022 Sep.
6
Canadian Urological Association guideline: Management of ureteral calculi - Abridged version.加拿大泌尿外科协会指南:输尿管结石的管理——缩略版
Can Urol Assoc J. 2021 Dec;15(12):383-393. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.7652.
7
Comparison of ureteroscopy (URS) complementary treatment after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy failure with primary URS lithotripsy with holmium laser treatment for proximal ureteral stones larger than10mm.比较体外冲击波碎石术(ESWL)失败后输尿管镜检查(URS)的补充治疗与钬激光治疗原发性 URS 碎石术治疗大于 10mm 的输尿管上段结石。
BMC Urol. 2021 Sep 13;21(1):126. doi: 10.1186/s12894-021-00892-7.
8
Canadian Urological Association guideline: Management of ureteral calculi - Full-text.加拿大泌尿外科协会指南:输尿管结石的管理 - 全文
Can Urol Assoc J. 2021 Dec;15(12):E676-E690. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.7581.
9
Indications and contraindications for shock wave lithotripsy and how to improve outcomes.冲击波碎石术的适应症、禁忌症及如何改善治疗效果。
Asian J Urol. 2018 Oct;5(4):256-263. doi: 10.1016/j.ajur.2018.08.006. Epub 2018 Sep 4.
10
Flexible ureteroscopy: Technological advancements, current indications and outcomes in the treatment of urolithiasis.软性输尿管镜检查:治疗尿石症的技术进展、当前适应症及治疗结果
Asian J Urol. 2015 Jul;2(3):133-141. doi: 10.1016/j.ajur.2015.06.002. Epub 2015 Jun 23.