Suppr超能文献

有毒金属化合物对Fpg和XPA这两种参与DNA修复的锌指蛋白活性的不同影响。

Differential effects of toxic metal compounds on the activities of Fpg and XPA, two zinc finger proteins involved in DNA repair.

作者信息

Asmuss M, Mullenders L H, Eker A, Hartwig A

机构信息

University of Karlsruhe, Department of Food Chemistry, D-76128 Karlsruhe, Germany.

出版信息

Carcinogenesis. 2000 Nov;21(11):2097-104. doi: 10.1093/carcin/21.11.2097.

Abstract

Even though not mutagenic, compounds of the carcinogenic metals nickel, cadmium, cobalt and arsenic have been shown previously to inhibit nucleotide excision repair and base excision repair at low, non-cytotoxic concentrations. Since some toxic metals have high affinities for -SH groups, we used the bacterial formamidopyrimidine-DNA glycosylase (Fpg protein) and the mammalian XPA protein as models to investigate whether zinc finger structures in DNA repair enzymes are particularly sensitive to carcinogenic and/or toxic metal compounds. Concentrations of </=1 mM Ni(II), Pb(II), As(III) or Co(II) did not affect the activity of the Fpg protein significantly. In contrast, the enzyme was inhibited in a dose-dependent manner by Cd(II), Cu(II) or Hg(II), starting at concentrations of 50 microM, 5 microM and 50 nM, respectively. Simultaneous treatment with Cd(II) or Cu(II) and Zn(II) partly prevented the inhibitions, while no reversal of inhibition was observed when Zn(II) was added after Cd(II) or Cu(II). In the case of Hg(II), Zn(II) had no protective effect independent of the time of its addition; however, the enzyme activity was completely restored by glutathione. Regarding XPA, Hg(II), Pb(II) or As(III) did not diminish its binding to an UV-irradiated oligonucleotide, while Cd(II), Co(II), Cu(II) and Ni(II) reduced its DNA-binding ability. Simultaneous treatment with Zn(II) prevented largely the inhibition induced by Cd(II), Co(II), and Ni(II), but only slightly in the case of Cu(II). Collectively, the results indicate that both proteins were inhibited by Cd(II) and Cu(II), XPA was additionally inactivated by Ni(II) and Co(II), and Fpg but not XPA was strongly affected by Hg(II). Even though other mechanisms of protein inactivation cannot be completely excluded, zinc finger structures may be sensitive targets for toxic metal compounds, but each zinc finger protein has unique sensitivities.

摘要

尽管致癌金属镍、镉、钴和砷的化合物不具有致突变性,但先前已表明,它们在低浓度、无细胞毒性时会抑制核苷酸切除修复和碱基切除修复。由于一些有毒金属对 -SH 基团具有高亲和力,我们以细菌甲酰胺嘧啶 -DNA 糖基化酶(Fpg 蛋白)和哺乳动物 XPA 蛋白为模型,研究 DNA 修复酶中的锌指结构是否对致癌和/或有毒金属化合物特别敏感。浓度≤1 mM 的 Ni(II)、Pb(II)、As(III) 或 Co(II) 对 Fpg 蛋白的活性没有显著影响。相比之下,Cd(II)、Cu(II) 或 Hg(II) 分别从 50 μM、5 μM 和 50 nM 的浓度开始以剂量依赖性方式抑制该酶。同时用 Cd(II) 或 Cu(II) 和 Zn(II) 处理可部分防止抑制作用,而在 Cd(II) 或 Cu(II) 之后添加 Zn(II) 时未观察到抑制作用的逆转。就 Hg(II) 而言,Zn(II) 无论添加时间如何均无保护作用;然而,谷胱甘肽可使酶活性完全恢复。关于 XPA,Hg(II)、Pb(II) 或 As(III) 不会降低其与紫外线照射的寡核苷酸的结合,而 Cd(II)、Co(II)、Cu(II) 和 Ni(II) 会降低其 DNA 结合能力。同时用 Zn(II) 处理在很大程度上可防止 Cd(II)、Co(II) 和 Ni(II) 诱导的抑制作用,但对 Cu(II) 诱导的抑制作用仅略有影响。总体而言,结果表明这两种蛋白均被 Cd(II) 和 Cu(II) 抑制,XPA 还被 Ni(II) 和 Co(II) 失活,Fpg 而非 XPA 受到 Hg(II) 的强烈影响。尽管不能完全排除蛋白质失活的其他机制,但锌指结构可能是有毒金属化合物的敏感靶点,但每种锌指蛋白具有独特的敏感性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验