Firsov A A, Lubenko I Y, Vostrov S N, Kononenko O V, Zinner S H, Portnoy Y A
Department of Pharmacokinetics, Centre for Science and Technology LekBioTech, 8 Nauchny proezd, Moscow 117246, Russia.
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2000 Nov;46(5):725-32. doi: 10.1093/jac/46.5.725.
To demonstrate the impact of the different pharmacokinetics of moxifloxacin and levofloxacin on their antimicrobial effects (AMEs), killing and regrowth kinetics of two clinical isolates of Staphylococcus aureus and one each of Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae were studied. With each organism, a series of monoexponential pharmacokinetic profiles of single doses of moxifloxacin (T:1/2 = 12.1 h) and levofloxacin (T:(1/2) = 6.8 h) were simulated. The respective eight-fold ranges of the ratios of area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) to the MIC were 58-475 and 114-934. Species- and strain-independent linear relationships observed between the intensity of AME (I:(E)) and log AUC/MIC were not superimposed for moxifloxacin and levofloxacin (r(2) = 0.99 in both cases). The predicted AUC/MIC ratios for moxifloxacin and levofloxacin that might be equivalent to Schentag's AUC/MIC breakpoint for ciprofloxacin (125) were estimated at 80 and 130, respectively. The respective equivalent MIC breakpoints were 0.41 mg/L (for a 400 mg dose of moxifloxacin) and 0.35 mg/L (for a 500 mg dose of levofloxacin). Based on the I:(E)-log AUC/MIC relationships, equiefficient 24 h doses (D:(24)s) of moxifloxacin and levofloxacin were calculated for hypothetical strains of S. aureus, E. coli and K. pneumoniae with MICs equal to the respective MIC50s (weighted geometric means of reported values). To provide an 'acceptable' I:(E) = 200 (log cfu/mL)*h, the D:(24)s of moxifloxacin for all three organisms were much lower (150, 30 and 60 mg, respectively) than the clinically proposed 400 mg dose. Although the usual dose of levofloxacin (500 mg) would be in excess for E. coli and K. pneumoniae (D:(24) = 36 and 220 mg, respectively), it might be insufficient for S. aureus (the estimated D:(24) = 850 mg). Moreover, to provide the same effect as a 400 mg D:(24) of moxifloxacin against staphylococci, levofloxacin would have to be given in a 5000 mg D:(24), which is 10-fold higher than its clinically accepted dose. The described method of generalization of data obtained with specific organisms to other representatives of the same species might be useful to predict the AMEs of new quinolones.
为证明莫西沙星和左氧氟沙星不同的药代动力学对其抗菌效果(AMEs)的影响,研究了金黄色葡萄球菌的两株临床分离株以及大肠埃希菌和肺炎克雷伯菌各一株的杀灭和再生长动力学。对于每种微生物,模拟了单剂量莫西沙星(T:1/2 = 12.1小时)和左氧氟沙星(T:(1/2) = 6.8小时)的一系列单指数药代动力学曲线。浓度-时间曲线下面积(AUC)与MIC的比值各自的八倍范围分别为58 - 475和114 - 934。观察到的AME强度(I:(E))与log AUC/MIC之间的种属和菌株无关的线性关系,莫西沙星和左氧氟沙星并不重叠(两种情况下r(2) = 0.99)。估计莫西沙星和左氧氟沙星可能等同于环丙沙星的Schentag AUC/MIC折点(125)的AUC/MIC比值分别为80和130。各自的等效MIC折点分别为0.41 mg/L(对于400 mg剂量的莫西沙星)和0.35 mg/L(对于500 mg剂量的左氧氟沙星)。基于I:(E)-log AUC/MIC关系,针对金黄色葡萄球菌、大肠埃希菌和肺炎克雷伯菌的假设菌株,其MIC等于各自的MIC50s(报告值的加权几何平均值),计算了莫西沙星和左氧氟沙星的等效24小时剂量(D:(24)s)。为提供“可接受的”I:(E) = 200(log cfu/mL)*小时,所有三种微生物的莫西沙星D:(24)s(分别为150、30和60 mg)远低于临床建议的400 mg剂量。虽然左氧氟沙星的常用剂量(500 mg)对大肠埃希菌和肺炎克雷伯菌过量(D:(24)分别为36和220 mg),但对金黄色葡萄球菌可能不足(估计D:(24) = 850 mg)。此外,为了对葡萄球菌产生与400 mg D:(24)莫西沙星相同的效果,左氧氟沙星必须给予5000 mg D:(24),这比其临床可接受剂量高10倍。将特定微生物获得的数据推广到同一物种的其他代表的所述方法,可能有助于预测新喹诺酮类药物的AMEs。